Doing Nothing: Difference between revisions

From WikiDemocracy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Koch Bros funded Conference 1991
[https://1drv.ms/b/s!AonSXQpG-K6lpygNe2tMirDJDnDM Cato Institute Brochure 6/05/1991]
One of the earliest samples of climate denialism. Probably the turning point of the Republican Party's adoption of climate denialism and the Koch Bros agenda.
=====Fossil fuel production on track for double the safe climate limit=====
=====Fossil fuel production on track for double the safe climate limit=====
[https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/nov/20/fossil-fuel-production-on-track-for-double-the-safe-climate-limit The Guardian 11/20/19]
[https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/nov/20/fossil-fuel-production-on-track-for-double-the-safe-climate-limit The Guardian 11/20/19]

Revision as of 10:21, 8 December 2019

Koch Bros funded Conference 1991 Cato Institute Brochure 6/05/1991

One of the earliest samples of climate denialism. Probably the turning point of the Republican Party's adoption of climate denialism and the Koch Bros agenda.


Fossil fuel production on track for double the safe climate limit

The Guardian 11/20/19

The world’s nations are on track to produce more than twice as much coal, oil and gas as can be burned in 2030 while restricting rise in the global temperature to 1.5C, analysis shows.
The report is the first to compare countries’ stated plans for fossil fuel extraction with the goals of the Paris climate agreement, which is to keep global heating well below 2C above pre-industrial levels, and to aim for 1.5C. It exposes a huge gap, with fossil fuel production in 2030 heading for 50% more than is consistent with 2C, and 120% more than that for 1.5C.
The report was produced by the UN Environment Programme and a coalition of research organisations. It complements an earlier UN analysis showing the current Paris agreement pledges to cut emissions would still lead to a catastrophic 3-4C rise.
Yes, the Climate Crisis May Wipe out Six Billion People

The Tyee 9/18/2019

One thing the climate crisis underscores is that Homo sapiens are not primarily a rational species. When forced to make important decisions, particularly decisions affecting our economic security or socio-political status, primitive instinct and raw emotion tend to take the upper hand.
This is not a good thing if the fate of society is at stake. Take “hope” for example. For good evolutionary reasons, humans naturally tend to be hopeful in times of stress. So gently comforting is this word, that some even endow their daughters with its name. But hope can be enervating, flat out debilitating, when it merges with mere wishful thinking — when we hope, for example, that technology alone can save us from climate change.


Laissez-faire: the Environmental Version

EcoOptimism 10/13/13

The Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy, caught my eye: “Laissez-faire takes on a new meaning — it is the ecosystem, not the economy that must be “left alone” to manage itself and evolve by its own rules.”