Climate Change-Solutions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
===== Do Nothing ===== | ===== Do Nothing ===== | ||
1. The Science referred to here is not compelling I have access to more compelling science. | 1. '''Direct Dispute:''' The Science referred to here is not compelling I have access to more compelling science. | ||
2. The potential effects are overstated. Humanity will have no problem adapting to a changing climate. | 2. '''Partial Dispute:''' The potential effects are overstated. Humanity will have no problem adapting to a changing climate. | ||
3. Laizze Faire. What happens in the future is not our worry today. | 3. '''Laizze Faire'''. What happens in the future is not our worry today. | ||
4. Tech Fix. Science will come up with a technological solutions before the damage is done. | 4. '''Tech Fix'''. Science will come up with a technological solutions before the damage is done. | ||
5. Natural population control. The Earth is better off without humanity or at least a much small human population. | 5. '''Natural population control'''. The Earth is better off without humanity or at least a much small human population. | ||
Revision as of 09:04, 11 January 2018
List of Solutions
Do Nothing
1. Direct Dispute: The Science referred to here is not compelling I have access to more compelling science.
2. Partial Dispute: The potential effects are overstated. Humanity will have no problem adapting to a changing climate.
3. Laizze Faire. What happens in the future is not our worry today.
4. Tech Fix. Science will come up with a technological solutions before the damage is done.
5. Natural population control. The Earth is better off without humanity or at least a much small human population.
