Hypotheses: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
c. Sympathetic bonds between individuals is a dominate influence in Human Nature. Therefore when can assume it had its origins in the animal world. | c. Sympathetic bonds between individuals is a dominate influence in Human Nature. Therefore when can assume it had its origins in the animal world. | ||
=== [[Bounded Rationality]] === | |||
Revision as of 10:06, 1 December 2016
This section is reserved for new hypotheses which can be clearly and succinctly stated (along with their foundational theories) here in this virtual realm. Evidence against or supporting these new hypotheses can be stated in the "Evidence" section. If these hypotheses are not your own, credit should be given where due. Although later discovery is fine, as there are few truly novel ideas.
1. Foundational theory: Darwinism.
Human nature has its origins in the animal world. Therefore our thought patterns are influenced by our biological history. Clues about our thought patterns can be gleaned by observing the animal world and vice versa. Kirk (talk) 09:35, 5 September 2016 (MDT)
a. Survival remains as the dominate influence in Human Nature just as it does in the animal world.
b. Procreation remains as a dominate influence in Human Nature just as it does in the animal world.
c. Sympathetic bonds between individuals is a dominate influence in Human Nature. Therefore when can assume it had its origins in the animal world.
