Electoral Systems-Effects - Revision history

Kirk: /* Lee Atwater Republican Southern Strategy From Gold Water to Trump */

2023-07-27T15:30:27Z

Lee Atwater Republican Southern Strategy From Gold Water to Trump

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:30, 27 July 2023
Line 8:		Line 8:
	}}		}}

			=====Why Fox News was created=====
			[https://theweek.com/articles/880107/why-fox-news-created WILLIAM FALK NOVEMBER 22, 2019 The Week]
			If Fox News had a DNA test, it would trace its origins to the Nixon administration. In 1970, political consultant Roger Ailes and other Nixon aides came up with a plan to create a new TV network that would circumvent existing media and provide "pro-administration" coverage to millions. "People are lazy," the aides explained in a memo. "With television you just sit — watch — listen. The thinking is done for you." Nixon embraced the idea, saying he and his supporters needed "our own news" from a network that would lead "a brutal, vicious attack on the opposition."
	=====Lee Atwater Republican Southern Strategy From Gold Water to Trump=====		=====Lee Atwater Republican Southern Strategy From Gold Water to Trump=====
	[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AT2fsv7xt4E "You start out in 1954 saying niger niger niger but then you get abstract and start saying you want to cut taxes and the by product of that is blacks get hurt worse than whites.]		[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AT2fsv7xt4E "You start out in 1954 saying niger niger niger but then you get abstract and start saying you want to cut taxes and the by product of that is blacks get hurt worse than whites.]

Kirk: /* Lee Atwater Republican Southern Strategy From Gold Water to Trump */

2023-07-27T15:23:43Z

Lee Atwater Republican Southern Strategy From Gold Water to Trump

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 27 July 2023
Line 9:		Line 9:

	=====Lee Atwater Republican Southern Strategy From Gold Water to Trump=====		=====Lee Atwater Republican Southern Strategy From Gold Water to Trump=====
	[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AT2fsv7xt4E You start out in ~~1958~~ saying niger niger niger but then you get abstract and start saying you want to cut taxes.]		[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AT2fsv7xt4E "You start out in 1954 saying niger niger niger but then you get abstract and start saying you want to cut taxes and the by product of that is blacks get hurt worse than whites.]

	=====The House Map’s Republican Bias Will Plummet In 2022 — Because Of Gerrymandering=====		=====The House Map’s Republican Bias Will Plummet In 2022 — Because Of Gerrymandering=====

Kirk: /* The House Map’s Republican Bias Will Plummet In 2022 — Because Of Gerrymandering */

2023-07-27T15:21:30Z

The House Map’s Republican Bias Will Plummet In 2022 — Because Of Gerrymandering

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:21, 27 July 2023
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\|image_height=200		\|image_height=200
	}}		}}

			=====Lee Atwater Republican Southern Strategy From Gold Water to Trump=====
			[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AT2fsv7xt4E You start out in 1958 saying niger niger niger but then you get abstract and start saying you want to cut taxes.]

	=====The House Map’s Republican Bias Will Plummet In 2022 — Because Of Gerrymandering=====		=====The House Map’s Republican Bias Will Plummet In 2022 — Because Of Gerrymandering=====
Line 12:		Line 15:
	Even in Democrats’ worst-case scenario at this point, the House’s long-standing (we’re talking over 50 years) bias toward Republicans would drastically diminish. That would certainly be historic — but it wouldn’t mean everything is finally hunky-dory with our congressional maps. Some of this increase in balance is thanks to courts striking down Republican gerrymanders in states such as North Carolina, but Democrats achieved this near-parity mostly through gerrymanders of their own in states such as New York and Illinois. The result is an overall national map that looks fair but individual state maps that are anything but.		Even in Democrats’ worst-case scenario at this point, the House’s long-standing (we’re talking over 50 years) bias toward Republicans would drastically diminish. That would certainly be historic — but it wouldn’t mean everything is finally hunky-dory with our congressional maps. Some of this increase in balance is thanks to courts striking down Republican gerrymanders in states such as North Carolina, but Democrats achieved this near-parity mostly through gerrymanders of their own in states such as New York and Illinois. The result is an overall national map that looks fair but individual state maps that are anything but.
	We have metrics to show this. Efficiency gap is a statistic that attempts to quantify how efficient a map is at converting votes into seats for a given party. For example, a map with an R+10 efficiency gap would be expected to produce 10 percent more Republican-leaning seats than a fair map would. The inventors of efficiency gap proposed a test whereby any map that produces two or more extra House seats for a party should be considered an unconstitutional gerrymander. Under the maps in place for the 2022 elections, seven states flunk that test, and several others come close.		We have metrics to show this. Efficiency gap is a statistic that attempts to quantify how efficient a map is at converting votes into seats for a given party. For example, a map with an R+10 efficiency gap would be expected to produce 10 percent more Republican-leaning seats than a fair map would. The inventors of efficiency gap proposed a test whereby any map that produces two or more extra House seats for a party should be considered an unconstitutional gerrymander. Under the maps in place for the 2022 elections, seven states flunk that test, and several others come close.


	=====The Supreme Court is Ready to Revive a policy to Make Most of Government Unconstitutional=====		=====The Supreme Court is Ready to Revive a policy to Make Most of Government Unconstitutional=====

Kirk at 15:30, 30 April 2022

2022-04-30T15:30:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:30, 30 April 2022
Line 8:		Line 8:
	}}		}}

	~~\|'''~~The House Map’s Republican Bias Will Plummet In 2022 — Because Of Gerrymandering~~'''~~		=====The House Map’s Republican Bias Will Plummet In 2022 — Because Of Gerrymandering=====
	~~[[File:Redistricting Map.jpg \|center\|thumb\|~~[https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-house-maps-republican-bias-will-plummet-in-2022-because-of-gerrymandering by By Nathaniel Rakich and Elena Mejía 3/31/2022 538]]]		[https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-house-maps-republican-bias-will-plummet-in-2022-because-of-gerrymandering by By Nathaniel Rakich and Elena Mejía 3/31/2022 538]
	Even in Democrats’ worst-case scenario at this point, the House’s long-standing (we’re talking over 50 years) bias toward Republicans would drastically diminish. That would certainly be historic — but it wouldn’t mean everything is finally hunky-dory with our congressional maps. Some of this increase in balance is thanks to courts striking down Republican gerrymanders in states such as North Carolina, but Democrats achieved this near-parity mostly through gerrymanders of their own in states such as New York and Illinois. The result is an overall national map that looks fair but individual state maps that are anything but.		Even in Democrats’ worst-case scenario at this point, the House’s long-standing (we’re talking over 50 years) bias toward Republicans would drastically diminish. That would certainly be historic — but it wouldn’t mean everything is finally hunky-dory with our congressional maps. Some of this increase in balance is thanks to courts striking down Republican gerrymanders in states such as North Carolina, but Democrats achieved this near-parity mostly through gerrymanders of their own in states such as New York and Illinois. The result is an overall national map that looks fair but individual state maps that are anything but.
	We have metrics to show this. Efficiency gap is a statistic that attempts to quantify how efficient a map is at converting votes into seats for a given party. For example, a map with an R+10 efficiency gap would be expected to produce 10 percent more Republican-leaning seats than a fair map would. The inventors of efficiency gap proposed a test whereby any map that produces two or more extra House seats for a party should be considered an unconstitutional gerrymander. Under the maps in place for the 2022 elections, seven states flunk that test, and several others come close.		We have metrics to show this. Efficiency gap is a statistic that attempts to quantify how efficient a map is at converting votes into seats for a given party. For example, a map with an R+10 efficiency gap would be expected to produce 10 percent more Republican-leaning seats than a fair map would. The inventors of efficiency gap proposed a test whereby any map that produces two or more extra House seats for a party should be considered an unconstitutional gerrymander. Under the maps in place for the 2022 elections, seven states flunk that test, and several others come close.

Kirk at 15:29, 30 April 2022

2022-04-30T15:29:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:29, 30 April 2022
Line 2:		Line 2:
	\|title=Curated News Gallery from all over the Web		\|title=Curated News Gallery from all over the Web
	\|description=Curated news selected for its relevance, longevity and non-prescriptive content.		\|description=Curated news selected for its relevance, longevity and non-prescriptive content.
	\|keywords=~~BLM~~, ~~black lives matter~~,~~Portland,federal forces,climate change,Ruth Bader Ginsberg,systemic racism,custom search engine~~,free classified ~~ads~~		\|keywords=elections,democracy,electoral,free classified,politics
	\|image=https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2020/07/23/USAT/ee3a642b-9c02-403b-960f-cffaaef37a62-LaT.jpeg?width=1320&height=882&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp		\|image=https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2020/07/23/USAT/ee3a642b-9c02-403b-960f-cffaaef37a62-LaT.jpeg?width=1320&height=882&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp
	\|image_width=300		\|image_width=300
	\|image_height=200		\|image_height=200
	}}		}}

			\|'''The House Map’s Republican Bias Will Plummet In 2022 — Because Of Gerrymandering'''
			[[File:Redistricting Map.jpg \|center\|thumb\|[https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-house-maps-republican-bias-will-plummet-in-2022-because-of-gerrymandering by By Nathaniel Rakich and Elena Mejía 3/31/2022 538]]]
			Even in Democrats’ worst-case scenario at this point, the House’s long-standing (we’re talking over 50 years) bias toward Republicans would drastically diminish. That would certainly be historic — but it wouldn’t mean everything is finally hunky-dory with our congressional maps. Some of this increase in balance is thanks to courts striking down Republican gerrymanders in states such as North Carolina, but Democrats achieved this near-parity mostly through gerrymanders of their own in states such as New York and Illinois. The result is an overall national map that looks fair but individual state maps that are anything but.
			We have metrics to show this. Efficiency gap is a statistic that attempts to quantify how efficient a map is at converting votes into seats for a given party. For example, a map with an R+10 efficiency gap would be expected to produce 10 percent more Republican-leaning seats than a fair map would. The inventors of efficiency gap proposed a test whereby any map that produces two or more extra House seats for a party should be considered an unconstitutional gerrymander. Under the maps in place for the 2022 elections, seven states flunk that test, and several others come close.


	=====The Supreme Court is Ready to Revive a policy to Make Most of Government Unconstitutional=====		=====The Supreme Court is Ready to Revive a policy to Make Most of Government Unconstitutional=====

Kirk at 17:37, 13 March 2022

2022-03-13T17:37:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:37, 13 March 2022
Line 8:		Line 8:
	}}		}}

			=====The Supreme Court is Ready to Revive a policy to Make Most of Government Unconstitutional=====
			[https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/12/3/1999711/-The-Supreme-Court-is-ready-to-revive-a-policy-to-make-most-of-the-government-unconstitutional]
			In 2019, four conservative members joined a dissent authored by Neil Gorsuch, who wrote that “the court should revive the dormant nondelegation doctrine.” Samuel Alito authored a separate opinion that also praised the nondelegation doctrine, and wished for an opportunity to make that clear in a case that was not about expanding prosecution of sex offenders. Since then both Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett have joined the nondelegation chorus.

	=====Our generation will either renew democracy -- or lose it forever=====		=====Our generation will either renew democracy -- or lose it forever=====

Kirk: /* Our generation will either renew democracy -- or lose it forever */

2021-11-21T18:37:34Z

Our generation will either renew democracy -- or lose it forever

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:37, 21 November 2021
Line 10:		Line 10:

	=====Our generation will either renew democracy -- or lose it forever=====		=====Our generation will either renew democracy -- or lose it forever=====
	[https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/08/opinions/american-democracy-trump-era-renew-lose-kasparov/index.html by Garry Kasparov ~~Nove~~ 17 2021 CNN]		[https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/08/opinions/american-democracy-trump-era-renew-lose-kasparov/index.html by Garry Kasparov Nov 17 2021 CNN]
	Because democratic sentiment is weak, the rights to vote and free speech are more vulnerable in my adopted home of America today than at any point in my life. And so I founded the Renew Democracy Initiative with leaders and thinkers from across the political spectrum to push back against America's growing illiberalism -- and to highlight the experiences of those like me, who have been at the forefront of fighting for democracy for decades.		Because democratic sentiment is weak, the rights to vote and free speech are more vulnerable in my adopted home of America today than at any point in my life. And so I founded the Renew Democracy Initiative with leaders and thinkers from across the political spectrum to push back against America's growing illiberalism -- and to highlight the experiences of those like me, who have been at the forefront of fighting for democracy for decades.

Kirk: /* How ranked-choice voting saved the Virginia GOP from itself */

2021-11-21T18:37:05Z

How ranked-choice voting saved the Virginia GOP from itself

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:37, 21 November 2021
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\|image_height=200		\|image_height=200
	}}		}}


			=====Our generation will either renew democracy -- or lose it forever=====
			[https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/08/opinions/american-democracy-trump-era-renew-lose-kasparov/index.html by Garry Kasparov Nove 17 2021 CNN]
			Because democratic sentiment is weak, the rights to vote and free speech are more vulnerable in my adopted home of America today than at any point in my life. And so I founded the Renew Democracy Initiative with leaders and thinkers from across the political spectrum to push back against America's growing illiberalism -- and to highlight the experiences of those like me, who have been at the forefront of fighting for democracy for decades.

Kirk at 13:45, 7 November 2021

2021-11-07T13:45:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:45, 7 November 2021
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\|image_height=200		\|image_height=200
	}}		}}


			=====How ranked-choice voting saved the Virginia GOP from itself=====
			[https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/how-ranked-choice-voting-saved-the-virginia-gop-from-itself/2021/11/05/6d1aa738-3dc2-11ec-8ee9-4f14a26749d1_story.html By Raymond J. La Raja and Alexander Theodoridis the Washington Post 11/01/2021]
			Under a ranked-choice system, when the ballots are tallied, the last-place candidate is removed and the second choices of his supporters are distributed to the other candidates. This process continues until one candidate is left standing. There are several benefits to doing things this way. First, voters can vote sincerely for their favorite candidates — even sure losers — because they know that their subsequent choices will be counted. More important for the quality of the selection, requiring that candidates do more than eke out a modest plurality makes it less likely that a factional candidate disliked by most of the party will prevail.
			Had the Virginia GOP held an ordinary primary, Chase might well have won — or at least, her attacks on Youngkin might have left him wounded in the general election. Chase might have also fared better in the pressure cooker of an in-person convention held under one roof — because Trump supporters are more likely to show up, and can be vocal and aggressive in support of their candidates. (That the pandemic prodded Republicans to distribute voting across the state was a lucky break.) In the end, Youngkin straddled quite deftly the Trump-loving base and pragmatic GOP-leaning voters in the suburbs, even as he made headway with persuadable independent voters.

	=====Dominion sues Sidney Powell for defamation, seeking $1.3 billion in damages=====		=====Dominion sues Sidney Powell for defamation, seeking $1.3 billion in damages=====

Kirk at 16:14, 8 January 2021

2021-01-08T16:14:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:14, 8 January 2021
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\|image_height=200		\|image_height=200
	}}		}}

			=====Dominion sues Sidney Powell for defamation, seeking $1.3 billion in damages=====
			[https://www.axios.com/dominion-sues-sidney-powell-defamation-99b3bb1f-a655-4f9a-8db8-8ccfa5f02393.html Axios Policy and Politics 1/08/21]
			The big picture: Dominion alleges that Powell acted "in concert with allies and media outlets determined to promote a false preconceived narrative about the 2020 election—caused unprecedented harm." In an interview with the Axios Re:Cap podcast last week, Dominion CEO John Poulos did not rule out suing Trump himself.

			What they're saying: "As a result of the defamatory falsehoods peddled by Powell ... Dominion’s founder, Dominion’s employees, Georgia’s governor, and Georgia’s secretary of state have been harassed and have received death threats, and Dominion has suffered enormous harm," the lawsuit reads.

	=====After 50 years of riding waves of hate, the GOP must finally decide if Trumpism is its future=====		=====After 50 years of riding waves of hate, the GOP must finally decide if Trumpism is its future=====