<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wikidemocracy.us/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Political_Ideologies_and_Human_Nature</id>
	<title>Political Ideologies and Human Nature - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wikidemocracy.us/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Political_Ideologies_and_Human_Nature"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wikidemocracy.us/index.php?title=Political_Ideologies_and_Human_Nature&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-09-20T01:43:41Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wikidemocracy.us/index.php?title=Political_Ideologies_and_Human_Nature&amp;diff=16853&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Lilly: Created page with &quot;=== Foundations: Ideology and Human Nature ===  =====Ideology===== [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ideology/ | Robin Celikates and Sally Haslanger | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2025]  Examines ideology as a system of ideas that interprets human behavior, social institutions, power, and political possibilities.  =====Human Nature===== [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/human-nature/ | Neil Roughley | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2021]  Explores com...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wikidemocracy.us/index.php?title=Political_Ideologies_and_Human_Nature&amp;diff=16853&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-07-23T15:00:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;=== Foundations: Ideology and Human Nature ===  =====Ideology===== [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ideology/ | Robin Celikates and Sally Haslanger | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2025]  Examines ideology as a system of ideas that interprets human behavior, social institutions, power, and political possibilities.  =====Human Nature===== [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/human-nature/ | Neil Roughley | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2021]  Explores com...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== Foundations: Ideology and Human Nature ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Ideology=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ideology/ | Robin Celikates and Sally Haslanger | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2025]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines ideology as a system of ideas that interprets human behavior, social institutions, power, and political possibilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Human Nature=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/human-nature/ | Neil Roughley | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explores competing definitions of human nature and whether biological or psychological traits limit possible political arrangements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Political Legitimacy=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legitimacy/ | Fabienne Peter | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2010]&lt;br /&gt;
 Investigates why people should obey governments and how consent, justice, democracy, and public reason can legitimize political authority.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Political Obligation=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/political-obligation/ | A. John Simmons | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2007]&lt;br /&gt;
 Reviews philosophical arguments concerning obedience, consent, fairness, gratitude, and membership in political communities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Social Institutions=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/social-institutions/ | Seumas Miller | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2007]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines how shared beliefs, human agency, cooperation, and power create and sustain institutions such as governments and markets.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Civic Education=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/civic-education/ | Jack Crittenden and Peter Levine | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2007]&lt;br /&gt;
 Discusses whether citizenship, tolerance, cooperation, and democratic character arise naturally or must be cultivated through education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Political Representation=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/political-representation/ | Suzanne Dovi | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2006]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explores how human interests, identities, judgments, and inequalities shape relationships between political representatives and citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Authority=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/authority/ | Tom Christiano | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2004]&lt;br /&gt;
 Considers whether human beings possess moral duties to obey authority and what characteristics make political commands legitimate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Law and Ideology=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/law-ideology/ | Christine Sypnowich | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2001]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explains how ideological assumptions about people, society, and power influence legal systems and interpretations of justice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Political Philosophy: Methodology=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://iep.utm.edu/polphil/ | Alexander Moseley | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | n.d.]&lt;br /&gt;
 Introduces political philosophy through questions about sociability, morality, freedom, authority, and the kind of life appropriate for human beings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical and Social-Contract Perspectives ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Ancient Political Philosophy=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ancient-political/ | Melissa Lane | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2010]&lt;br /&gt;
 Surveys Greek arguments about reason, virtue, citizenship, justice, and the idea that humans are naturally political animals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Jean-Jacques Rousseau=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rousseau/ | Christopher Bertram | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2010]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explores Rousseau’s belief that humans are naturally compassionate but transformed by property, inequality, dependence, and social institutions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Locke’s Political Philosophy=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke-political/ | Eric Mack | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2005]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines how Locke derives limited government from natural freedom, equality, self-ownership, and duties toward other human beings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Plato’s Ethics and Politics in The Republic=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-ethics-politics/ | Eric Brown | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2003]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines Plato’s comparison between the human soul and the political community, including the roles of reason, appetite, and social order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Hobbes’s Moral and Political Philosophy=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hobbes-moral/ | Sharon A. Lloyd and Susanne Sreedhar | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2002]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explains how fear, equality of vulnerability, competition, and rational self-preservation support Hobbes’s argument for sovereign authority.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====John Locke=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke/ | William Uzgalis | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2001]&lt;br /&gt;
 Surveys Locke’s account of reason, natural rights, property, religious toleration, government by consent, and resistance to tyranny.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Aristotle’s Political Theory=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-politics/ | Fred Miller | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 1998]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explains Aristotle’s view that political association develops from human sociability and enables people to pursue virtue and flourishing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Niccolò Machiavelli=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://iep.utm.edu/machiave/ | Erica Benner | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | n.d.]&lt;br /&gt;
 Describes Machiavelli’s understanding of people as acquisitive, ambitious, changeable, and strongly influenced by necessity and political circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Thomas Hobbes: Moral and Political Philosophy=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://iep.utm.edu/hobmoral/ | Sharon A. Lloyd and Susanne Sreedhar | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | n.d.]&lt;br /&gt;
 Connects Hobbes’s political theory to a view of humans as vulnerable, competitive, self-interested, rational, and capable of cooperation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Social Contract Theory=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/ | Celeste Friend | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | n.d.]&lt;br /&gt;
 Compares Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Rawls, and critics who use hypothetical human conditions to explain political authority and obligation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Liberalism, Libertarianism, and Individualism ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Autonomy in Moral and Political Philosophy=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/autonomy-moral/ | John Christman | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2003]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines the liberal assumption that people can reflect upon, revise, and take responsibility for their values and choices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Positive and Negative Liberty=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberty-positive-negative/ | Ian Carter | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2003]&lt;br /&gt;
 Contrasts freedom from external interference with freedom understood as self-mastery, autonomy, development, or collective control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====John Stuart Mill=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mill/ | Fred Wilson | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2002]&lt;br /&gt;
 Reviews Mill’s arguments for liberty, individuality, representative government, education, and the progressive development of human capacities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Libertarianism=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/libertarianism/ | Bas van der Vossen | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2002]&lt;br /&gt;
 Surveys theories that give strong priority to individual liberty, voluntary exchange, private property, and personal responsibility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Paternalism=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/paternalism/ | Gerald Dworkin | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2002]&lt;br /&gt;
 Investigates when governments may restrict freedom for a person’s own welfare and what paternalism assumes about judgment and rationality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Privacy=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/privacy/ | Judith DeCew | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2002]&lt;br /&gt;
 Considers privacy as a condition of individuality, autonomy, intimate association, dignity, and protection from political or social control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Freedom of Speech=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/freedom-speech/ | David van Mill | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2002]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines arguments based on autonomy, truth-seeking, democracy, human fallibility, harm, tolerance, and distrust of censorship.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Liberalism=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberalism/ | Gerald Gaus, Shane D. Courtland and David Schmidtz | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 1996]&lt;br /&gt;
 Surveys liberal theories built around freedom, individuality, equality, toleration, limited authority, and confidence in human reason.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Individualism in Classical Chinese Thought=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://iep.utm.edu/ind-chin/ | Erica Brindley | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | n.d.]&lt;br /&gt;
 Shows that debates about individual fulfillment, social roles, authority, and human development extend beyond Western liberal traditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Robert Nozick’s Political Philosophy=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://iep.utm.edu/noz-poli/ | Eric Mack | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | n.d.]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explains Nozick’s defense of individual rights and the minimal state based on self-ownership and restrictions on coercing human beings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conservatism, Tradition, and Human Imperfection ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Michael Oakeshott=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/oakeshott/ | Terry Nardin | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2020]&lt;br /&gt;
 Presents a conservative view of politics as a practical activity shaped by experience rather than a project for remaking humanity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Conservatism=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/conservatism/ | Andy Hamilton | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2015]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explains conservative skepticism toward human perfectibility, abstract reason, rapid social transformation, and utopian political projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Differences in Negativity Bias Underlie Variations in Political Ideology=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13001192 | John R. Hibbing, Kevin B. Smith and John R. Alford | Behavioral and Brain Sciences | 2014]&lt;br /&gt;
 Argues that ideological differences may partly reflect contrasting sensitivity to danger, disorder, loss, and other negative environmental stimuli.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x | Dana R. Carney, John T. Jost, Samuel D. Gosling and Jeff Potter | Political Psychology | 2008]&lt;br /&gt;
 Reports behavioral and environmental differences associated with liberal and conservative personalities, preferences, and everyday lives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Conservatives Are Happier Than Liberals, but Why?=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02124.x | Jaime L. Napier and John T. Jost | Psychological Science | 2008]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines whether acceptance of inequality and rationalization of existing social arrangements help explain ideological differences in reported happiness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Political Conservatism and Left-Right Orientation in 28 Eastern and Western European Countries=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00587.x | Alain Van Hiel, Mario Pandelaere and Bart Duriez | Political Psychology | 2007]&lt;br /&gt;
 Investigates how psychological traits and social conditions influence conservative identification across diverse national settings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====David Hume’s Moral Philosophy=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-moral/ | Rachel Cohon | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2004]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explores Hume’s view that passions, sympathy, habit, convention, and utility matter more to morality and politics than pure reason.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 | John T. Jost, Jack Glaser, Arie W. Kruglanski and Frank J. Sulloway | Psychological Bulletin | 2003]&lt;br /&gt;
 Reviews evidence connecting conservatism with needs to manage uncertainty, threat, order, stability, and resistance to disruptive change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Edmund Burke=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://iep.utm.edu/edmund-burke/ | William F. Byrne | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | n.d.]&lt;br /&gt;
 Reviews Burke’s belief that inherited institutions and traditions contain accumulated knowledge that individual reason cannot easily replace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Tradition=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/tradition/ | Mark Bevir | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | n.d.]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines how inherited practices and beliefs influence human judgment, identity, belonging, and resistance to political change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Socialism, Marxism, and Human Development ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Communism=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.britannica.com/topic/communism | Encyclopaedia Britannica Editors | Encyclopaedia Britannica | 2025]&lt;br /&gt;
 Introduces communist theories of common ownership, class abolition, social cooperation, historical development, and transformation of human relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Critical Theory=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/critical-theory/ | Robin Celikates and Jeffrey Flynn | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2023]&lt;br /&gt;
 Surveys theories of domination, emancipation, alienation, ideology, social transformation, and the human capacity for reflective freedom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Socialism=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/socialism/ | Pablo Gilabert and Martin O’Neill | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2019]&lt;br /&gt;
 Surveys socialist arguments about cooperation, equality, freedom, community, exploitation, and democratic control over economic life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Alienation=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/alienation/ | David Leopold | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2018]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines estrangement from work, other people, society, political power, and oneself in Marxist and contemporary social theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Exploitation=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/exploitation/ | Matt Zwolinski and Alan Wertheimer | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2017]&lt;br /&gt;
 Investigates when social and economic relationships unfairly use human vulnerability, labor, dependence, or unequal bargaining power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Herbert Marcuse=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marcuse/ | Arnold Farr | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2013]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines Marcuse’s effort to recover human creativity, liberation, and critical consciousness from capitalist conformity and technological domination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====G. A. Cohen=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cohen/ | Nicholas Vrousalis | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2013]&lt;br /&gt;
 Reviews analytical Marxist arguments about equality, freedom, incentives, community, self-ownership, and the moral requirements of socialism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Karl Marx=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marx/ | Jonathan Wolff and David Leopold | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2003]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explores Marx’s ideas about alienation, productive activity, class, historical change, capitalism, communism, and human flourishing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Marx’s Theory of Human Nature=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.marxists.org/archive/fromm/works/1961/man/ch04.htm | Erich Fromm | Marx’s Concept of Man | 1961]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explains Marx’s conception of people as active, creative, social beings whose capacities can be distorted by alienated labor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Antonio Gramsci=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://iep.utm.edu/gramsci/ | Martin Clark | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | n.d.]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explores cultural hegemony, consent, education, intellectual leadership, and the ways political orders shape ordinary human consciousness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Foundations: Ideology and Human Nature ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Ideology=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ideology/ | Robin Celikates and Sally Haslanger | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2025]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines ideology as a system of ideas that interprets human behavior, social institutions, power, and political possibilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Human Nature=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/human-nature/ | Neil Roughley | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explores competing definitions of human nature and whether biological or psychological traits limit possible political arrangements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Political Legitimacy=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legitimacy/ | Fabienne Peter | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2010]&lt;br /&gt;
 Investigates why people should obey governments and how consent, justice, democracy, and public reason can legitimize political authority.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Political Obligation=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/political-obligation/ | A. John Simmons | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2007]&lt;br /&gt;
 Reviews philosophical arguments concerning obedience, consent, fairness, gratitude, and membership in political communities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Social Institutions=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/social-institutions/ | Seumas Miller | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2007]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines how shared beliefs, human agency, cooperation, and power create and sustain institutions such as governments and markets.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Civic Education=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/civic-education/ | Jack Crittenden and Peter Levine | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2007]&lt;br /&gt;
 Discusses whether citizenship, tolerance, cooperation, and democratic character arise naturally or must be cultivated through education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Political Representation=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/political-representation/ | Suzanne Dovi | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2006]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explores how human interests, identities, judgments, and inequalities shape relationships between political representatives and citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Authority=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/authority/ | Tom Christiano | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2004]&lt;br /&gt;
 Considers whether human beings possess moral duties to obey authority and what characteristics make political commands legitimate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Law and Ideology=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/law-ideology/ | Christine Sypnowich | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2001]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explains how ideological assumptions about people, society, and power influence legal systems and interpretations of justice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Political Philosophy: Methodology=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://iep.utm.edu/polphil/ | Alexander Moseley | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | n.d.]&lt;br /&gt;
 Introduces political philosophy through questions about sociability, morality, freedom, authority, and the kind of life appropriate for human beings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical and Social-Contract Perspectives ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Ancient Political Philosophy=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ancient-political/ | Melissa Lane | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2010]&lt;br /&gt;
 Surveys Greek arguments about reason, virtue, citizenship, justice, and the idea that humans are naturally political animals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Jean-Jacques Rousseau=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rousseau/ | Christopher Bertram | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2010]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explores Rousseau’s belief that humans are naturally compassionate but transformed by property, inequality, dependence, and social institutions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Locke’s Political Philosophy=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke-political/ | Eric Mack | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2005]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines how Locke derives limited government from natural freedom, equality, self-ownership, and duties toward other human beings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Plato’s Ethics and Politics in The Republic=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-ethics-politics/ | Eric Brown | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2003]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines Plato’s comparison between the human soul and the political community, including the roles of reason, appetite, and social order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Hobbes’s Moral and Political Philosophy=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hobbes-moral/ | Sharon A. Lloyd and Susanne Sreedhar | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2002]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explains how fear, equality of vulnerability, competition, and rational self-preservation support Hobbes’s argument for sovereign authority.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====John Locke=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke/ | William Uzgalis | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2001]&lt;br /&gt;
 Surveys Locke’s account of reason, natural rights, property, religious toleration, government by consent, and resistance to tyranny.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Aristotle’s Political Theory=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-politics/ | Fred Miller | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 1998]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explains Aristotle’s view that political association develops from human sociability and enables people to pursue virtue and flourishing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Niccolò Machiavelli=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://iep.utm.edu/machiave/ | Erica Benner | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | n.d.]&lt;br /&gt;
 Describes Machiavelli’s understanding of people as acquisitive, ambitious, changeable, and strongly influenced by necessity and political circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Thomas Hobbes: Moral and Political Philosophy=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://iep.utm.edu/hobmoral/ | Sharon A. Lloyd and Susanne Sreedhar | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | n.d.]&lt;br /&gt;
 Connects Hobbes’s political theory to a view of humans as vulnerable, competitive, self-interested, rational, and capable of cooperation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Social Contract Theory=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/ | Celeste Friend | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | n.d.]&lt;br /&gt;
 Compares Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Rawls, and critics who use hypothetical human conditions to explain political authority and obligation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Liberalism, Libertarianism, and Individualism ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Autonomy in Moral and Political Philosophy=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/autonomy-moral/ | John Christman | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2003]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines the liberal assumption that people can reflect upon, revise, and take responsibility for their values and choices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Positive and Negative Liberty=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberty-positive-negative/ | Ian Carter | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2003]&lt;br /&gt;
 Contrasts freedom from external interference with freedom understood as self-mastery, autonomy, development, or collective control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====John Stuart Mill=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mill/ | Fred Wilson | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2002]&lt;br /&gt;
 Reviews Mill’s arguments for liberty, individuality, representative government, education, and the progressive development of human capacities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Libertarianism=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/libertarianism/ | Bas van der Vossen | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2002]&lt;br /&gt;
 Surveys theories that give strong priority to individual liberty, voluntary exchange, private property, and personal responsibility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Paternalism=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/paternalism/ | Gerald Dworkin | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2002]&lt;br /&gt;
 Investigates when governments may restrict freedom for a person’s own welfare and what paternalism assumes about judgment and rationality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Privacy=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/privacy/ | Judith DeCew | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2002]&lt;br /&gt;
 Considers privacy as a condition of individuality, autonomy, intimate association, dignity, and protection from political or social control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Freedom of Speech=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/freedom-speech/ | David van Mill | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2002]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines arguments based on autonomy, truth-seeking, democracy, human fallibility, harm, tolerance, and distrust of censorship.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Liberalism=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberalism/ | Gerald Gaus, Shane D. Courtland and David Schmidtz | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 1996]&lt;br /&gt;
 Surveys liberal theories built around freedom, individuality, equality, toleration, limited authority, and confidence in human reason.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Individualism in Classical Chinese Thought=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://iep.utm.edu/ind-chin/ | Erica Brindley | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | n.d.]&lt;br /&gt;
 Shows that debates about individual fulfillment, social roles, authority, and human development extend beyond Western liberal traditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Robert Nozick’s Political Philosophy=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://iep.utm.edu/noz-poli/ | Eric Mack | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | n.d.]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explains Nozick’s defense of individual rights and the minimal state based on self-ownership and restrictions on coercing human beings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conservatism, Tradition, and Human Imperfection ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Michael Oakeshott=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/oakeshott/ | Terry Nardin | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2020]&lt;br /&gt;
 Presents a conservative view of politics as a practical activity shaped by experience rather than a project for remaking humanity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Conservatism=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/conservatism/ | Andy Hamilton | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2015]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explains conservative skepticism toward human perfectibility, abstract reason, rapid social transformation, and utopian political projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Differences in Negativity Bias Underlie Variations in Political Ideology=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13001192 | John R. Hibbing, Kevin B. Smith and John R. Alford | Behavioral and Brain Sciences | 2014]&lt;br /&gt;
 Argues that ideological differences may partly reflect contrasting sensitivity to danger, disorder, loss, and other negative environmental stimuli.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x | Dana R. Carney, John T. Jost, Samuel D. Gosling and Jeff Potter | Political Psychology | 2008]&lt;br /&gt;
 Reports behavioral and environmental differences associated with liberal and conservative personalities, preferences, and everyday lives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Conservatives Are Happier Than Liberals, but Why?=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02124.x | Jaime L. Napier and John T. Jost | Psychological Science | 2008]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines whether acceptance of inequality and rationalization of existing social arrangements help explain ideological differences in reported happiness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Political Conservatism and Left-Right Orientation in 28 Eastern and Western European Countries=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00587.x | Alain Van Hiel, Mario Pandelaere and Bart Duriez | Political Psychology | 2007]&lt;br /&gt;
 Investigates how psychological traits and social conditions influence conservative identification across diverse national settings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====David Hume’s Moral Philosophy=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-moral/ | Rachel Cohon | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2004]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explores Hume’s view that passions, sympathy, habit, convention, and utility matter more to morality and politics than pure reason.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 | John T. Jost, Jack Glaser, Arie W. Kruglanski and Frank J. Sulloway | Psychological Bulletin | 2003]&lt;br /&gt;
 Reviews evidence connecting conservatism with needs to manage uncertainty, threat, order, stability, and resistance to disruptive change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Edmund Burke=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://iep.utm.edu/edmund-burke/ | William F. Byrne | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | n.d.]&lt;br /&gt;
 Reviews Burke’s belief that inherited institutions and traditions contain accumulated knowledge that individual reason cannot easily replace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Tradition=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/tradition/ | Mark Bevir | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | n.d.]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines how inherited practices and beliefs influence human judgment, identity, belonging, and resistance to political change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Socialism, Marxism, and Human Development ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Communism=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.britannica.com/topic/communism | Encyclopaedia Britannica Editors | Encyclopaedia Britannica | 2025]&lt;br /&gt;
 Introduces communist theories of common ownership, class abolition, social cooperation, historical development, and transformation of human relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Critical Theory=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/critical-theory/ | Robin Celikates and Jeffrey Flynn | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2023]&lt;br /&gt;
 Surveys theories of domination, emancipation, alienation, ideology, social transformation, and the human capacity for reflective freedom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Socialism=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/socialism/ | Pablo Gilabert and Martin O’Neill | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2019]&lt;br /&gt;
 Surveys socialist arguments about cooperation, equality, freedom, community, exploitation, and democratic control over economic life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Alienation=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/alienation/ | David Leopold | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2018]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines estrangement from work, other people, society, political power, and oneself in Marxist and contemporary social theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Exploitation=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/exploitation/ | Matt Zwolinski and Alan Wertheimer | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2017]&lt;br /&gt;
 Investigates when social and economic relationships unfairly use human vulnerability, labor, dependence, or unequal bargaining power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Herbert Marcuse=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marcuse/ | Arnold Farr | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2013]&lt;br /&gt;
 Examines Marcuse’s effort to recover human creativity, liberation, and critical consciousness from capitalist conformity and technological domination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====G. A. Cohen=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cohen/ | Nicholas Vrousalis | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2013]&lt;br /&gt;
 Reviews analytical Marxist arguments about equality, freedom, incentives, community, self-ownership, and the moral requirements of socialism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Karl Marx=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marx/ | Jonathan Wolff and David Leopold | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | 2003]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explores Marx’s ideas about alienation, productive activity, class, historical change, capitalism, communism, and human flourishing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Marx’s Theory of Human Nature=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.marxists.org/archive/fromm/works/1961/man/ch04.htm | Erich Fromm | Marx’s Concept of Man | 1961]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explains Marx’s conception of people as active, creative, social beings whose capacities can be distorted by alienated labor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Antonio Gramsci=====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://iep.utm.edu/gramsci/ | Martin Clark | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | n.d.]&lt;br /&gt;
 Explores cultural hegemony, consent, education, intellectual leadership, and the ways political orders shape ordinary human consciousness.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lilly</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>