Correspondence: Difference between revisions
From WikiDemocracy
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Application Questions == | |||
Here is what is required in order to submit an official application for an SB9 land division with the Public Works Dept.; | |||
1. Final Parcel Map submittal – Please include the existing building footprint if applicable, existing utilities (underground and aerial), proposed building envelope(s) on a 3rd non-titled plan sheet and title the lot split SB 9 on the map | |||
2. 2 Paper copies of Parcel Map and an electronic copy | |||
3. Submit a response to the SB 9 requirements (They are listed under “Qualifying Criteria for a Housing Development or Lot Split) | |||
4. Lot Closure Calculations | |||
5. Preliminary Title Report | |||
6. Soil Report – if located in a high liquefaction area or the slope is greater than 30%. | |||
7. A check in the amount of $3,735.00 payable to the City of Santa Cruz | |||
8. Prior to recording the Parcel Map the current and next fiscal year’s property taxes must be paid in full | |||
9. Once approved print map in Mylar’s and submit to Public Works for the recordation process | |||
10. A check in the amount of $89.00 (recording fee) payable to the County of Santa Cruz | |||
11. Map submittal must be performed by a design professional and have a property survey included | |||
== Fire Wall Questions == | |||
Hi Kirk, | |||
Yes, your assumption is correct - the firewall is required regardless. | |||
Thank you, | |||
Domonique Speight | |||
<nowiki>-----</nowiki>Original Message----- | |||
From: Kirk <[email protected]> | |||
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 10:58 AM | |||
To: Building Counter <[email protected]> | |||
Subject: Re: SB9 Flag Lot Inquiry | |||
Hi Domonique, | |||
Thank you for this info, it helps me move forward. I assume these requirements apply even when the adjoining portion of the newly created lot can not be built on (that is the narrow 10' access portion of the new lot)? I just want to be clear that the existing house will need a new fire wall along that access portion which is what the requirements would seem to indicate. | |||
Thank you, Kirk | |||
Hi Kirk, | |||
Apologies for the delay on this. I've attached couple of tables that should give you the answers you need on the fire ratings necessary for exterior walls and any projections on this build. | |||
Note that one of the attachments is for dwellings with a sprinkler system. | |||
Thank you, | |||
Domonique Speight | |||
<nowiki>-----</nowiki>Original Message----- | |||
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> | |||
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2023 8:49 AM | |||
To: Building Counter <[email protected]> | |||
Subject: SB9 Flag Lot Inquiry | |||
Hello=, | |||
I've spoken a bit with John Jezek in planning about designing a flag lot for a potential SB9 lot split at 126 Acadia Ave. He said a fire wall of some kind might be required on the existing house because of the new flag lot proximity. I've attached a proposed plot plan, maybe you can help me determine what would be required and the timing of any required improvements. | |||
Thank Kirk Garber | |||
== Ownership Questions == | == Ownership Questions == | ||
Thank you for your patience. | Thank you for your patience. | ||
