Environment-Population: Difference between revisions

From WikiDemocracy
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{#seo:
{{#seo:
|title=Curated News Gallery from all over the Web
|title=Population and the Environment
|description=Curated news selected for its relevance, longevity and non-prescriptive content.
|description=News links pertaining to the environment and human population
|keywords=BLM, black lives matter,Portland,federal forces,climate change,Ruth Bader Ginsberg,systemic racism,custom search engine,free classified ads
|keywords=Population, over-population, holding capacity, environmental adaptions, environmental destruction, birth rate,
|image=https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2020/07/23/USAT/ee3a642b-9c02-403b-960f-cffaaef37a62-LaT.jpeg?width=1320&height=882&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp
|image=File:Overpopulation.jpg
|image_width=300
|image_width=300
|image_height=200
|image_height=200
}}
}}
===== How community crofting experiment could help repopulate the Highlands =====
[https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jan/10/how-community-crofting-experiment-scotland-glengarry-repopulate-highlands by Severin Carrel 10/1/23 The Guardian]
Local people in Glengarry are creating woodland crofts in nearby forests – affordable family homes designed for craftspeople, carpenters and small-scale farmers, using a shared ownership model designed to combat the soaring costs of scarce rural homes.


=====Deforestation and world population sustainability: a quantitative analysis=====
=====Deforestation and world population sustainability: a quantitative analysis=====
[https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-63657-6?fbclid=IwAR0VJoZAo9h_igPanG7F0deqRp-B1aCZ-zxHQ7qhOKG7BOcqcJKDbi0OBEk | Nature May 20 2020]
[https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-63657-6?fbclid=IwAR0VJoZAo9h_igPanG7F0deqRp-B1aCZ-zxHQ7qhOKG7BOcqcJKDbi0OBEk Nature May 20 2020]
Open Access Published: 06 May 2020 Mauro Bologna & Gerardo Aquino  
Open Access Published: 06 May 2020 Mauro Bologna & Gerardo Aquino  
  Based on the current resource consumption rates and best estimate of technological rate growth our study shows that we have very low probability, less than 10% in most optimistic estimate, to survive without facing a catastrophic collapse.
  Based on the current resource consumption rates and best estimate of technological rate growth our study shows that we have very low probability, less than 10% in most optimistic estimate, to survive without facing a catastrophic collapse.