Health Care-Prevention-Other: Difference between revisions

From WikiDemocracy
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
|'''Infamous paper that popularized unproven COVID-19 treatment finally retracted'''
[[File:Didier Raoult.jpg|thumb|center| [https://www.science.org/content/article/infamous-paper-popularized-unproven-covid-19-treatment-finally-retracted?utm_campaign=Science&utm_medium=ownedSocial&utm_source=Bluesky by Cathleen O’Grady 12/17/24 Science]]]
A 2020 paper that sparked widespread enthusiasm for hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment was retracted today,
  Then-IHU Director Didier Raoult, the paper’s senior author, enthused about the promise of the drug on social media and TV, leading to a wave of hype, including from then-U.S. President Donald Trump.
But scientists immediately raised concerns about the paper, noting the sample size of only 36 patients and the unusually short peer review time: The paper was submitted on 16 March 2020 and published 4 days later.
=====Here is how we know that vaccines do not cause autism=====
=====Here is how we know that vaccines do not cause autism=====
[https://www.statnews.com/2025/02/03/vaccine-autism-rfk-jr-how-science-proves-vaccines-do-not-cause-autism/ By Matthew Herper 2/03/2025 STAT]
[https://www.statnews.com/2025/02/03/vaccine-autism-rfk-jr-how-science-proves-vaccines-do-not-cause-autism/ By Matthew Herper 2/03/2025 STAT]