Posting: Difference between revisions
From WikiDemocracy
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Post news items waiting to be sorted on this page[https://wikidemocracy.us/index.php?title=Posting&action=edit Edit source] == | == Post news items waiting to be sorted on this page[https://wikidemocracy.us/index.php?title=Posting&action=edit Edit source] == | ||
=====The best of both worlds? The Danish electoral system 1915–20 in a comparative perspective===== | |||
[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/026137949290014W by Jorgen Elklit 3/9/92 ScienceDirect] | |||
The Danish 1915–1920 Lower House electoral system combined a traditional plurality system and a PR system with multi-stage compensatory seats in two provincial regions, and closed party list PR in the third, metropolitan, region. This complex system is presented and its effects on the distribution of seats in the Folketing are analysed. It was an early—and now neglected—case of personalized PR which calls for comparisons with later cases of this kind of electoral system, notably the post-1949 German electoral system and the 1990 electoral systems in Hungary and Bulgaria. In order to assess if such comparisons are appropriate, the paper also asks if these four electoral systems are genuine ‘mixed’ systems or PR systems in disguise. | |||
=====Who controls the wealth? Electoral system design and ethnic war in resource-rich countries===== | =====Who controls the wealth? Electoral system design and ethnic war in resource-rich countries===== | ||
[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261379414000663 by Natasha S. Neudorfer 9/14 ScienceDirect] | [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261379414000663 by Natasha S. Neudorfer 9/14 ScienceDirect] | ||
