Ancient Egyptian Art: Difference between revisions
From WikiDemocracy
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 210: | Line 210: | ||
[https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/13/6/174 by Tara Prakash 29/2/24 MDPI] | [https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/13/6/174 by Tara Prakash 29/2/24 MDPI] | ||
Drawing on methods and theories from the history of emotions, this paper examines the Twin Stelae that flank the entrance into Ramses II’s Great Temple at Abu Simbel in order to investigate the feelings associated with ancient Egyptian kingship from an ideological perspective. As the ruler, what was the king himself supposed to feel, and what feelings was he meant to elicit in his subjects? | Drawing on methods and theories from the history of emotions, this paper examines the Twin Stelae that flank the entrance into Ramses II’s Great Temple at Abu Simbel in order to investigate the feelings associated with ancient Egyptian kingship from an ideological perspective. As the ruler, what was the king himself supposed to feel, and what feelings was he meant to elicit in his subjects? | ||
=====Curated Desertscapes in Ancient Egyptian Tombs and Investigating Iconographies of the Wild===== | |||
[https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/11/3/59 by Jennifer Miyuki Babcock 1/4/22 MDPI] | |||
Because of a long-standing bias toward examining human representation in Egyptian art, scholars have overlooked many details of how wild animals are rendered, at least until recently. Usually, the stylistic differences between animals and humans in ancient Egyptian art are emphasized to support the argument that animals and their environs encapsulate ancient Egyptian ideas of “chaos”, while humans and their cultivated world encapsulate “order”. | |||