Mental adaptations: Difference between revisions

From WikiDemocracy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "=====The irreconcilable acceptance of near-term extinction===== [https://guymcpherson.com/2013/04/the-irreconcilable-acceptance-of-near-term-extinction/ Nature Bats Last 04/18...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
=====The climate apocalypse is coming. To prepare for it, we need to admit that we can’t prevent it.=====
[https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/what-if-we-stopped-pretending?fbclid=IwAR3oT4KhAlJWRAU1yJYP3IuhcRW59LApjHSawFy1bl6Wkk5AR2hsCjYtC_Y The New Yorker Jonathan Franzen 9/08 2019]
Even at this late date, expressions of unrealistic hope continue to abound. Hardly a day seems to pass without my reading that it’s time to “roll up our sleeves” and “save the planet”; that the problem of climate change can be “solved” if we summon the collective will. Although this message was probably still true in 1988, when the science became fully clear, we’ve emitted as much atmospheric carbon in the past thirty years as we did in the previous two centuries of industrialization. The facts have changed, but somehow the message stays the same.
=====The irreconcilable acceptance of near-term extinction=====
=====The irreconcilable acceptance of near-term extinction=====
[https://guymcpherson.com/2013/04/the-irreconcilable-acceptance-of-near-term-extinction/ Nature Bats Last 04/18/2013]
[https://guymcpherson.com/2013/04/the-irreconcilable-acceptance-of-near-term-extinction/ Nature Bats Last 04/18/2013]

Revision as of 09:31, 18 September 2019

The climate apocalypse is coming. To prepare for it, we need to admit that we can’t prevent it.

The New Yorker Jonathan Franzen 9/08 2019

Even at this late date, expressions of unrealistic hope continue to abound. Hardly a day seems to pass without my reading that it’s time to “roll up our sleeves” and “save the planet”; that the problem of climate change can be “solved” if we summon the collective will. Although this message was probably still true in 1988, when the science became fully clear, we’ve emitted as much atmospheric carbon in the past thirty years as we did in the previous two centuries of industrialization. The facts have changed, but somehow the message stays the same.
The irreconcilable acceptance of near-term extinction

Nature Bats Last 04/18/2013

I have decided after decades of feral study, without any sense of certainty, and based only on my opinion as to what is and isn’t probable, that when the Arctic sea ice is completely gone during the summer, when the earth’s Holocene epoch completely loses one of its primary thermal regulators, we are probably only a few years at best, before the ruling classes of the world realize global agriculture is untenable, and at that point, the lack of alternatives will be rather self-evident. And I simply have no desire to live through that deleterious fallout, nor do I even feel I have a right to.
What an endless perverse decay of ideas we now embark, where NTE(Near Term Extinction) can be seen as a bizarre new lease on life for those who are in a position to access it.
So, I am not one for skulking through what remains of this life, only to carefully arrive at extinction. I am going out on my terms, no one else’s. But until that day comes, I’m going to embrace this endless redefining of life for as long as I desire, as I hysterically fall out of this world.
If NTE is a tsunami, I’m sure in the hell not going to wait for it to arrive, I’m going to swim out to it across the desert night sky.