Repeal of the Roadless Rule: Difference between revisions
From WikiDemocracy
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|title=Roadless Rule Repeal: What It Could Mean for U.S. National Forests | |title=Roadless Rule Repeal: What It Could Mean for U.S. National Forests | ||
|description= | |description=This repeal is being presented as something needed to prevent wildfires. However more fires occur on lands with roads. More roads would also negatively effect water quality, reduce habitat connectivity and biodiversity. This article explores the overall plan and its potential effects. | ||
|keywords=Roadless Rule, Roadless Rule repeal, national forests, U.S. Forest Service, public lands, national forest policy, forest conservation, forest management, logging, road construction, inventoried roadless areas, wildfires, wildfire management, drinking water, watersheds, biodiversity, wildlife habitat, habitat fragmentation, Tongass National Forest, forest roads, environmental policy, federal land policy, public land management, USDA, Trump administration, forest carbon, Indigenous subsistence, forest ecology | |keywords=Roadless Rule, Roadless Rule repeal, national forests, U.S. Forest Service, public lands, national forest policy, forest conservation, forest management, logging, road construction, inventoried roadless areas, wildfires, wildfire management, drinking water, watersheds, biodiversity, wildlife habitat, habitat fragmentation, Tongass National Forest, forest roads, environmental policy, federal land policy, public land management, USDA, Trump administration, forest carbon, Indigenous subsistence, forest ecology | ||
