Electoral College = Minority Rule: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
of the system used to elect our president. | of the system used to elect our president. | ||
It could be a whole lot worse. | It could be a whole lot worse. | ||
Is it easier to get the support of 28 people or 82 million people? | '''Is it easier to get the support of 28 people or 82 million people? | ||
''' | |||
The mathematical structure of the Electoral College makes this a reality; | The mathematical structure of the Electoral College makes this a reality; | ||
'''Unity=loser Division=Winner''' | '''Unity=loser Division=Winner''' | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
2. The Constitution does not dictate that Electors are selected | 2. The Constitution does not dictate that Electors are selected | ||
by means of the popular vote. So in theory a state could assign | by means of the popular vote. So in theory a state could assign | ||
one person to decide who their Electoral votes will go to. | one person to decide who their Electoral votes will go to or simply | ||
have such extreme voter suppression that only one person is qualified | |||
to vote. | |||
3. The Constitution does allow states to select their Electors via | 3. The Constitution does allow states to select their Electors via | ||
| Line 42: | Line 44: | ||
required). | required). | ||
'''Conclusion:''' based on this, someone like Trump is simply a product | '''Conclusion:''' based on this, '''someone like Trump is simply a product | ||
of the Electoral System which someone like him prospers under. There will | of the Electoral System which someone like him prospers under. There will | ||
be others like Trump even if he loses this particular election because | be others like Trump''' even if he loses this particular election because | ||
the mathematical structure of the Electoral College favors dividers over | the mathematical structure of the Electoral College favors dividers over | ||
uniters. | uniters. | ||
| Line 50: | Line 52: | ||
That is why phrases like: Southern Strategy, Red States vs Blue States, | That is why phrases like: Southern Strategy, Red States vs Blue States, | ||
Coastal Elites, Fly-over country, "we're a republic not a democracy", | Coastal Elites, Fly-over country, "we're a republic not a democracy", | ||
systemic racism, etc, etc have featured so prominently in our political | systemic racism, gerrymandering, small state senators etc, etc have | ||
discourse. | featured so prominently in our political discourse. | ||
Our country has gone through many decades where the winner of the overall | Our country has gone through many decades where the winner of the overall | ||
| Line 57: | Line 59: | ||
election. This is because most states select their Electors via popular vote | election. This is because most states select their Electors via popular vote | ||
and only practice minimal voter suppression strategies, but this is a rather | and only practice minimal voter suppression strategies, but this is a rather | ||
naïve approach. | naïve approach. '''Once more candidates for elected office see the advantages | ||
of gaming a poorly designed electoral system this will get worse. | |||
''' | |||
</poem> | </poem> | ||
Revision as of 07:34, 6 November 2020
Answer- 81,999,989 or 82,000,0000 loser vs 28 winner
Question- What is the largest difference in voter margin possible when the winner of the Electoral College loses the popular vote.
As we sit and ponder how one candidate
who received nearly 5 million more votes than
the other candidate can win by just the narrowest of margins overall.
The answer is rather simple if one looks at the mathematical foundation
of the system used to elect our president.
It could be a whole lot worse.
Is it easier to get the support of 28 people or 82 million people?
The mathematical structure of the Electoral College makes this a reality;
Unity=loser Division=Winner
The above scenario is based on the following set of assumptions:
The winning candidate gets the support of 1 voter from each of the
30 smallest states. Putting them at 271 Electoral Votes
The losing candidate gets the support of 100% of registered voters
from the 20 largest states putting them at 265 Electoral Votes.
Seems outrageous? That is a emotional value judgement.
This particular scenario is an extremely unlikely one,
but there is a whole lot of grey area in-between.
Remember:
1, The SCOTUS is dominated by "Originalist" who claim to stick
to the text of the Constitution vaguely tempered in some way
by their own individual interpretation of the mores during the
time the Constitution was written.
2. The Constitution does not dictate that Electors are selected
by means of the popular vote. So in theory a state could assign
one person to decide who their Electoral votes will go to or simply
have such extreme voter suppression that only one person is qualified
to vote.
3. The Constitution does allow states to select their Electors via
popular vote if they chose to. (Most states do that now, but it is not
required).
Conclusion: based on this, someone like Trump is simply a product
of the Electoral System which someone like him prospers under. There will
be others like Trump even if he loses this particular election because
the mathematical structure of the Electoral College favors dividers over
uniters.
That is why phrases like: Southern Strategy, Red States vs Blue States,
Coastal Elites, Fly-over country, "we're a republic not a democracy",
systemic racism, gerrymandering, small state senators etc, etc have
featured so prominently in our political discourse.
Our country has gone through many decades where the winner of the overall
popular vote has usually ended up as the winner of the presidential
election. This is because most states select their Electors via popular vote
and only practice minimal voter suppression strategies, but this is a rather
naïve approach. Once more candidates for elected office see the advantages
of gaming a poorly designed electoral system this will get worse.
