Government-Electoral Systems Other: Difference between revisions
From WikiDemocracy
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{#seo: | {{#seo: | ||
|title=World Electoral Systems== | |title=World Electoral Systems== | ||
=====Global: Governments’ adoption of unchecked technologies in social protection systems undermines rights ===== | |||
[https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/03/global-governments-adoption-of-unchecked-technologies-in-social-protection-systems-undermines-rights/ by AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL 6/3/24] | |||
“From Serbia, to India, to the Netherlands, these technologies are hailed as cutting-edge solutions by governments to achieve a better distribution of resources, improve administrative systems, detect fraud, and enhance security. However, Amnesty International’s research has shown that the unchecked digitization of social protection systems poses many risks to human rights, and exacerbates inequalities,” said Imogen Richmond-Bishop, Technology & Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Researcher at Amnesty Tech. | |||
=====Amnesty International sounds alarm on a watershed moment for international law amid flagrant rule-breaking by governments and corporate actors===== | =====Amnesty International sounds alarm on a watershed moment for international law amid flagrant rule-breaking by governments and corporate actors===== | ||
[https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/04/amnesty-international-sounds-alarm-international-law-flagrant-rule-breaking-governments-corporate-actors/ by AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL 24/4/24] | [https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/04/amnesty-international-sounds-alarm-international-law-flagrant-rule-breaking-governments-corporate-actors/ by AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL 24/4/24] | ||
