Logging Effects: Difference between revisions
From WikiDemocracy
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 281: | Line 281: | ||
[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724007771 by Jorge Luis Reategui-Betancourt 15/2/25 ScienceDirect] | [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724007771 by Jorge Luis Reategui-Betancourt 15/2/25 ScienceDirect] | ||
Tree growth predictions still present a challenge to forestry scientists. Species richness, ecological behavior variations, and different climate and soil interactions make it difficult to predict and understand tree growth in managed forests. This study examined the relationship between soil, climate, and forest management parameters and tree growth, using data from more than 30 years of monitoring in the Brazilian Amazon. | Tree growth predictions still present a challenge to forestry scientists. Species richness, ecological behavior variations, and different climate and soil interactions make it difficult to predict and understand tree growth in managed forests. This study examined the relationship between soil, climate, and forest management parameters and tree growth, using data from more than 30 years of monitoring in the Brazilian Amazon. | ||
=====Potential losses of animal-dispersed trees due to selective logging in Amazonian forest concessions===== | |||
[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719322001236 by Elildo A.R. Carvalho Jr 9/22 ScienceDirect] | |||
Fruits and seeds are key food resources for most Amazonian mammals and birds. Selective logging is an increasingly dominant land use in the region that can deplete these resources over large areas. However, this potential impact remains poorly studied. Here we assess potential losses of animal-dispersed (endozoochorous and synzoochorous) trees resulting from reduced-impact logging in Amazonian forest concessions. | |||
