Logging Effects: Difference between revisions
From WikiDemocracy
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 354: | Line 354: | ||
[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112721010410 by Ni Putu Diana Mahayani 15/2/22 ScienceDirect] | [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112721010410 by Ni Putu Diana Mahayani 15/2/22 ScienceDirect] | ||
Regenerating logged-over forests have become the predominant form of tropical forest cover (Asner et al., 2009, Gaveau et al., 2014). | Regenerating logged-over forests have become the predominant form of tropical forest cover (Asner et al., 2009, Gaveau et al., 2014). | ||
=====Effects of sanitation logging in winter on the Eurasian spruce bark beetle and predatory long-legged flies===== | |||
[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037811272300899X by Jan Weslien 15/2/22 ScienceDirect] | |||
The efficiency of sanitation logging also depends on how many bark beetles remain in the tree till the time of felling. In Central Europe, SBB overwinters to a high degree in the bark of the killed trees in lowland-areas with multivoltine populations, whereas a high proportion of the SBB adults leave the trees before winter in the mountains (Wild, 1953, von Biermann, 1977, Wermelinger et al., 2012, Dworschak et al., 2014, Kasumović et al., 2019). | |||
