Logging Effects: Difference between revisions

From WikiDemocracy
Jump to navigationJump to search
Lilly (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lilly (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 598: Line 598:
[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037811270700881X by M. Peña-Claros 20/9/08 ScienceDirect]
[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037811270700881X by M. Peña-Claros 20/9/08 ScienceDirect]
  Use of reduced-impact logging (RIL) techniques has repeatedly been shown to reduce damage caused by logging. Unfortunately, these techniques do not necessarily ameliorate the low growth rates of many commercial species or otherwise assure recovery of the initial volume harvested during the next cutting cycle.
  Use of reduced-impact logging (RIL) techniques has repeatedly been shown to reduce damage caused by logging. Unfortunately, these techniques do not necessarily ameliorate the low growth rates of many commercial species or otherwise assure recovery of the initial volume harvested during the next cutting cycle.
=====Species grouping and diameter growth of trees in the Eastern Amazon: Influence of environmental factors after reduced-impact logging=====
[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724007771 by Jorge Luis Reategui-Betancourt 15/2/25 ScienceDirect]
Tree growth predictions still present a challenge to forestry scientists. Species richness, ecological behavior variations, and different climate and soil interactions make it difficult to predict and understand tree growth in managed forests.