The Enlightenment Era: Difference between revisions

From WikiDemocracy
Jump to navigationJump to search
Lilly (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lilly (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 106: Line 106:
[https://openstax.org/books/us-history/pages/4-4-great-awakening-and-enlightenment by openstax]
[https://openstax.org/books/us-history/pages/4-4-great-awakening-and-enlightenment by openstax]
  During the eighteenth century, the British Atlantic experienced an outburst of Protestant revivalism known as the First Great Awakening. (A Second Great Awakening would take place in the 1800s.) During the First Great Awakening, evangelists came from the ranks of several Protestant denominations: Congregationalists, Anglicans (members of the Church of England), and Presbyterians. They rejected what appeared to be sterile, formal modes of worship in favor of a vigorous emotional religiosity. Whereas Martin Luther and John Calvin had preached a doctrine of predestination and close reading of scripture, new evangelical ministers spread a message of personal and experiential faith that rose above mere book learning. Individuals
  During the eighteenth century, the British Atlantic experienced an outburst of Protestant revivalism known as the First Great Awakening. (A Second Great Awakening would take place in the 1800s.) During the First Great Awakening, evangelists came from the ranks of several Protestant denominations: Congregationalists, Anglicans (members of the Church of England), and Presbyterians. They rejected what appeared to be sterile, formal modes of worship in favor of a vigorous emotional religiosity. Whereas Martin Luther and John Calvin had preached a doctrine of predestination and close reading of scripture, new evangelical ministers spread a message of personal and experiential faith that rose above mere book learning. Individuals
=====The Enlightenment:=====
[https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691161457/the-enlightenment?srsltid=AfmBOorXLWNXN_rdnbrNyoawGqsz0x5lhKLXEEcz-EWPkQ2ADzLi4Wfy by Vincenzo Ferrone]
In this concise and powerful book, one of the world’s leading historians of the Enlightenment provides a bracing and clarifying new interpretation of this watershed period. Arguing that philosophical and historical interpretations of the era have long been hopelessly confused, Vincenzo Ferrone makes the case that it is only by separating these views and taking an approach grounded in social and cultural history that we can begin to grasp what the Enlightenment was—and why it is still relevant today.