Government-Crime: Difference between revisions
From WikiDemocracy
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
[https://edition.cnn.com/2021/10/06/health/us-homicide-rate-increase-nchs-study by Jacqueline Howard 6/10/21 CNN] | [https://edition.cnn.com/2021/10/06/health/us-homicide-rate-increase-nchs-study by Jacqueline Howard 6/10/21 CNN] | ||
“The only larger increase since we’ve been recording these data occurred between 1904 and 1905, and that increase was most likely – at least partly – the result of better reporting,” Anderson told CNN. “We had states being added to what we refer to as the death registration areas, so we were counting deaths in more areas over time. We didn’t have all states reporting until 1933.” | “The only larger increase since we’ve been recording these data occurred between 1904 and 1905, and that increase was most likely – at least partly – the result of better reporting,” Anderson told CNN. “We had states being added to what we refer to as the death registration areas, so we were counting deaths in more areas over time. We didn’t have all states reporting until 1933.” | ||
=====Times and spaces of crime in the Historic Centre of Porto: Evidence from official data===== | |||
[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S026427512400266X by Rui Leandro Maia 7/24 ScienceDirect] | |||
The analysis of official data is a traditional strategy to study criminality in a geographic space (e.g., city, country). This work focuses on the analysis of the official statistics of crime against property at the Historic Centre of Porto, Portugal, in 2018. It addresses temporal (i.e., by period of the week, time of day) and spatial patterns (i.e., spatial analysis, typology of spaces) of crime occurrences. The database was analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics, and by spatial density analysis. | |||
