Government-Crime: Difference between revisions

From WikiDemocracy
Jump to navigationJump to search
Lilly (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lilly (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 151: Line 151:
[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047235217305214 by Barry Latzer 2018 ScienceDirect]
[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047235217305214 by Barry Latzer 2018 ScienceDirect]
  From the late 1960s to the mid-1990s, the United States suffered a massive crime wave, including perhaps the biggest sustained rise in violent crime in its history, certainly the biggest in the 20th century (Latzer, 2016). Violent crime rates, as measured by FBI reports of offenses known to police, rose from 161 per 100,000 in 1960 to 758 in 1991, a staggering 371% escalation. Murder rates for 1970 to 1995 averaged 8.97 per 100,000, and in fourteen of these years tolled 9 per 100,000 or more (FBI, UCR Data Online).
  From the late 1960s to the mid-1990s, the United States suffered a massive crime wave, including perhaps the biggest sustained rise in violent crime in its history, certainly the biggest in the 20th century (Latzer, 2016). Violent crime rates, as measured by FBI reports of offenses known to police, rose from 161 per 100,000 in 1960 to 758 in 1991, a staggering 371% escalation. Murder rates for 1970 to 1995 averaged 8.97 per 100,000, and in fourteen of these years tolled 9 per 100,000 or more (FBI, UCR Data Online).
=====The lead-crime hypothesis: A meta-analysis=====
[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166046222000667 by Anthony Higney 11/22 ScienceDirect]
Homicide rates spiked and then fell in a consistent pattern across many western countries in the 20th century (Fig. 1). In the US alone the homicide rate has halved since the 1980s, when it was as high as the road fatality rate is today. In other countries the falls are not so great in magnitude, but still amount to many lives saved. If the causes of this fall were known, many more deaths and trauma could be prevented.