Christian Nationalism and the Separation of Church and State
- NOTOC**
Christian Nationalism and the Separation of Church and State
Christian nationalism and the separation of church and state have become increasingly prominent subjects in debates over religion, government, education, national identity, and constitutional law in the United States. The controversy involves several related but distinct questions: how Christian nationalism should be defined, what the First Amendment prohibits or permits, how historical practices should influence constitutional interpretation, and where the boundary lies between protected religious participation in public life and government promotion of religion.
The sources on this subject reveal substantial disagreement. Critics of Christian nationalism generally describe it as an effort to fuse Christian identity with American national identity and to give Christianity a privileged position in government or public institutions. Some supporters of stronger Christian influence in public life reject this characterization and argue that the term is sometimes used too broadly, encompassing ordinary religious conservatism, patriotism, or constitutionally protected political participation by Christians.
These disagreements overlap with a much older American debate over the meaning of religious liberty and the First Amendment.
Constitutional Foundations and the Meaning of Separation
The First Amendment provides that Congress shall make no law "respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." These Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses form the constitutional foundation for federal protections concerning religion.
The phrase "separation of church and state" does not itself appear in the Constitution. Its most famous American formulation comes from Thomas Jefferson's 1802 letter to the Danbury Baptist Association, in which he described the First Amendment as building a "wall of separation between Church & State."
The underlying principles predate Jefferson's letter. Roger Williams argued in the seventeenth century for substantial institutional separation between civil government and religious authority. Baptists and other religious minorities later resisted established churches and religious taxation. James Madison argued against government financial support for religion and defended freedom of conscience.
Historians and legal scholars nevertheless disagree about exactly what the founding generation understood nonestablishment to require. One interpretation emphasizes a strong institutional boundary designed to prevent government sponsorship, financing, or promotion of religion. Another emphasizes a narrower prohibition against establishing an official national church or coercing religious observance.
These competing historical interpretations continue to influence modern debates over Christian nationalism.
Christian Nationalism and the Idea of a Christian Nation
Christian nationalism is not synonymous with Christianity, patriotism, religious conservatism, or participation by Christians in politics. Researchers increasingly emphasize the importance of distinguishing among these concepts.
In its more state-centered form, Christian nationalism generally connects American national identity with Christianity while favoring some degree of governmental recognition, promotion, or protection of a specifically Christian national character. Researchers have also distinguished this orientation from religious traditionalism, in which individuals may hold conservative Christian beliefs without favoring increased governmental religious authority.
Advocates and critics disagree considerably about the boundaries of the term. Some scholars argue that Christian nationalism represents a distinctive political ideology involving national identity, religion, and state power. Others caution that excessively broad definitions can classify traditional religious beliefs or normal democratic participation as Christian nationalism even when those beliefs do not involve government establishment of Christianity.
This definitional dispute is important because the constitutional issue is generally not whether religious citizens may participate in government. They possess the same rights of political speech, association, voting, and religious exercise as other citizens. The more difficult constitutional questions arise when government itself sponsors, favors, funds, coerces participation in, or otherwise becomes closely identified with religion.
Supreme Court Doctrine and the Establishment Clause
Supreme Court doctrine concerning church and state has changed significantly over time.
During the twentieth century, decisions such as Engel v. Vitale prohibited government-written prayer in public schools, while cases involving Bible reading, religious instruction, government funding, religious displays, and other practices developed an extensive body of Establishment Clause law.
In Lemon v. Kurtzman in 1971, the Court developed what became known as the Lemon test. Government action was examined for its purpose, its principal effect on religion, and whether it created excessive governmental entanglement with religion.
The Court subsequently relied on additional concepts including neutrality, endorsement, coercion, and historical practice. Cases such as Marsh v. Chambers and Town of Greece v. Galloway gave substantial weight to historical traditions when considering legislative prayer. Decisions concerning Ten Commandments monuments and other longstanding religious displays also demonstrated that context and history could affect constitutional analysis.
A major doctrinal change became explicit in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District in 2022. The Court stated that the Lemon framework had been abandoned and directed courts toward an analysis based on historical practices and understandings.
The change did not automatically erase earlier Establishment Clause precedents. Courts continue to face questions about how older rulings should operate under the history-and-tradition framework. Scholars disagree about which historical periods and practices should receive the greatest weight, how coercion should be evaluated, and how historical practices developed in a less religiously diverse society should be applied today.
Religion and Public Schools
Public schools have long been one of the most important arenas for church-state disputes because attendance is compulsory for many students and schools are government institutions.
Supreme Court decisions have prohibited government-written school prayer and certain government-sponsored devotional exercises. At the same time, students generally retain rights to voluntary prayer, religious discussion, religious clubs, and other forms of private religious expression.
The distinction between private religious exercise and government sponsorship is therefore central. A student praying voluntarily is constitutionally different from a school directing students to participate in prayer.
Recent controversies have involved school employees' religious expression, school chaplains, Bible instruction, religious curriculum materials, released-time programs, and requirements concerning the Ten Commandments.
Released-time programs illustrate the complexity of the issue. Under such arrangements, students may leave public-school property during the school day to receive privately operated religious instruction. Supporters characterize these programs as expressions of parental choice and religious freedom. Critics question their effects on students, school operations, inclusion, and the relationship between public institutions and religious organizations.
Federal guidance similarly distinguishes constitutionally protected private religious expression from religious exercises sponsored by public-school officials.
Ten Commandments and Religious Displays
Government display of the Ten Commandments has produced decades of constitutional litigation.
In Stone v. Graham, the Supreme Court invalidated a Kentucky requirement that the Ten Commandments be displayed in public-school classrooms. Later cases produced different outcomes depending on the location, history, context, and purpose of the display.
The Supreme Court's movement away from the Lemon test has generated renewed debate about how these precedents should apply.
Beginning in the mid-2020s, several states considered or adopted measures involving Ten Commandments displays in public schools. Louisiana, Texas, and Arkansas became major centers of litigation. Supporters have argued that the Ten Commandments have historical significance and should be evaluated under the Supreme Court's emphasis on history and tradition. Opponents, including parents from multiple religious traditions and religious-liberty organizations, have argued that mandatory classroom displays constitute government promotion of religious doctrine.
Court proceedings have produced different outcomes at different stages, leaving significant constitutional questions unresolved. The disputes demonstrate the importance of distinguishing a final nationwide constitutional rule from preliminary injunctions, appeals, and rulings applying only to particular parties or jurisdictions.
Religious displays outside schools can raise different considerations. Courts have sometimes treated longstanding monuments, legislative prayer, mottos, and ceremonial references to religion differently from religious exercises directed toward students.
Religious Charter Schools and Public Funding
Another major question concerns whether government-funded educational programs must include religious institutions on the same terms as secular institutions.
Supreme Court decisions in recent years have strengthened protections against excluding religious organizations from generally available benefit programs solely because of their religious character. At the same time, a separate issue arises when an institution is itself considered part of the government.
That question became central in the dispute over St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School in Oklahoma. Supporters argued that excluding a religious organization from the charter-school program amounted to religious discrimination. Opponents argued that charter schools were public institutions and that an explicitly religious charter school would therefore amount to government-funded religious education.
In May 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court divided 4-4 in the case, with one justice not participating. The result left the Oklahoma Supreme Court judgment against the proposed religious charter school in place but created no controlling nationwide Supreme Court precedent resolving the broader constitutional issue.
The controversy illustrates an important tension between two constitutional principles: preventing governmental establishment of religion and preventing governmental discrimination against religion.
Public Opinion and Academic Research
Polling included in the source material shows that Americans hold complex views about religion in public life.
Many Americans support institutional separation between church and state while simultaneously believing religion can contribute positively to society or public morality. Views differ on questions such as declaring Christianity the national religion, using the Bible as a basis for law, school prayer, religious displays, and the appropriate influence of religious values on government.
Research on Christian nationalism similarly identifies important internal distinctions.
Some studies examine what researchers describe as Christian statism: support for governmental authority being used to advance Christian identity or priorities. Other research distinguishes such views from religious traditionalism, which may involve strong Christian commitments without support for state enforcement or privilege.
Studies have examined associations between Christian-nationalist attitudes and views concerning education, courts, government spending, national identity, race, American exceptionalism, democratic institutions, and political authority. The findings generally describe statistical relationships rather than demonstrating that Christian nationalism alone causes particular political attitudes.
Researchers also continue to debate measurement. Some scholars caution that survey questions about America's Christian history, religious values, or national identity may capture several different phenomena and should not automatically be interpreted as equivalent support for a Christian state.
Religious Perspectives on Church-State Separation
Religious communities are themselves divided over Christian nationalism and church-state separation.
Baptist organizations have frequently drawn on their denomination's history of dissent from established religion to argue that church-state separation protects both government and religious faith. Some Baptist writers maintain that Christianity is weakened rather than strengthened when government gains authority to promote it.
Seventh-day Adventist writers have expressed similar concerns, reflecting their denomination's historical emphasis on religious liberty.
Other Christian commentators argue for a narrower concept of separation. They maintain that preventing an established church should not mean excluding religious ideas, symbols, or citizens from public life. Some writers sympathetic to Christian nationalism go further and argue that Christianity should have a more explicit role in shaping national political identity and government.
Jewish organizations, humanist organizations, interfaith groups, and advocates representing religious minorities have raised concerns that governmental preference for Christianity could create unequal citizenship or weaken protections for minority faiths and nonreligious Americans.
These competing perspectives demonstrate why debates over Christian nationalism cannot be reduced simply to religious people versus secular people. Significant disagreements exist within Christianity itself about the proper relationship between religious faith and political authority.
Competing Understandings of Religious Liberty
Much of the contemporary disagreement reflects different understandings of what governmental neutrality toward religion requires.
A separationist approach generally stresses that government should neither sponsor religion nor place citizens in situations where government institutions favor one faith over another.
A different approach emphasizes equal treatment. From this perspective, excluding religious individuals or organizations from programs otherwise open to comparable secular participants may itself constitute unconstitutional discrimination.
Modern Supreme Court cases increasingly require courts to consider both concerns simultaneously. Government must avoid impermissible religious establishment, but it also cannot treat religious activity as inherently disfavored.
The result is a constitutional landscape in which the boundary between accommodation and establishment is frequently contested.
Christian Nationalism and Contemporary Church-State Conflicts
The source material documents church-state controversies extending well beyond abstract constitutional theory.
Debates have emerged over Ten Commandments laws, Bible instruction, school prayer, chaplains, released-time religious education, religious charter schools, public funding, religious monuments, government ceremonies, military institutions, political endorsements by churches, and the use of explicitly Christian symbolism in political movements.
Christian nationalism has become one framework through which scholars, journalists, religious leaders, advocates, and political actors interpret these developments. Yet disagreements about the term remain substantial.
For this reason, analyzing particular policies can be more informative than relying on the label alone. Relevant questions include whether the government is acting or a private citizen is acting; whether participation is voluntary; whether one religious tradition receives preferential treatment; whether public funds are involved; whether individuals are being coerced; and whether comparable religious and secular organizations are being treated equally.
These concrete questions often reveal the constitutional issues more clearly than broad disputes over terminology.
Conclusion
The debate over Christian nationalism and separation of church and state combines history, constitutional interpretation, religious liberty, national identity, education, and contemporary politics.
American constitutional tradition protects robust religious exercise and permits religious citizens to participate fully in political life. At the same time, the Establishment Clause places limits on governmental involvement with religion. Determining exactly where those limits lie has never been entirely settled.
The Supreme Court's movement from the Lemon test toward historical practices and understandings has changed the legal framework, but it has not eliminated disputes over coercion, religious favoritism, government neutrality, public education, or taxpayer support for religious institutions.
Christian nationalism adds another dimension because it raises questions about whether Christianity should merely participate in American public life or occupy a privileged position within national identity and government. Scholars, religious groups, legal organizations, and political advocates offer sharply different answers.
The continuing debate therefore concerns more than the influence of religion in politics. At its center is a longstanding constitutional question: how can a society simultaneously protect the free exercise of religion, permit religious participation in public affairs, and prevent governmental power from establishing or privileging a particular faith?
- TOC**
Definitions, Constitutional Foundations, Public Opinion, and Scholarly Debate
1. | Scott A. Leadingham | Freedom Forum | May 21, 2026
Explains Christian nationalism and distinguishes government promotion of Christianity from constitutionally protected religious expression by individuals and organizations.
2. | Chip Rotolo and Gregory A. Smith | Pew Research Center | May 14, 2026
Examines American attitudes toward religion in government, Christian nationalism, official recognition of Christianity, biblical influence on law, and enforcement of the separation of church and state.
3. | Jesse Smith | Religious Studies Review | 2026
Critically examines scholarship on Christian nationalism and cautions against definitions broad enough to conflate distinct forms of religious identity, conservatism, nationalism, and political engagement.
4. | U.S. National Park Service | National Park Service | December 5, 2025
Traces church-state separation from Roger Williams through Jefferson, Madison, the First Amendment, and the development of religious liberty in the United States.
Reviews the history and judicial interpretation of the Establishment Clause, including the Lemon, endorsement, coercion, neutrality, and history-and-tradition approaches.
6. | PRRI Staff | Public Religion Research Institute | July 8, 2025
Examines views about political endorsements by churches and compares attitudes among religious groups and people classified by PRRI as Christian nationalism Adherents, Sympathizers, Skeptics, and Rejecters.
7. | Nilay Saiya | Harvard Divinity School | March 5, 2025
Places American Christian nationalism in comparative international perspective and examines how religious nationalism interacts with political power and religious freedom.
8. | PRRI | Public Religion Research Institute | 2025
Studies support for democratic principles, including church-state separation, and examines how Christian nationalism, religious identity, race, and authoritarian attitudes interact.
9. | Pew Research Center | Pew Research Center | December 20, 2024
Compiles polling and background material concerning Americans' attitudes toward prayer and religious activity in public schools.
10. | Chip Rotolo, Gregory A. Smith, and Jonathan Evans | Pew Research Center | March 15, 2024
Surveys views about Christian nationalism, declaring Christianity the national religion, biblical influence on American law, and whether the federal government should enforce church-state separation.
11. | Pew Research Center | Pew Research Center | March 15, 2024
Provides broader polling context on religion in American public life and measures attitudes associated with Christian nationalism, including school prayer, Bible-based law, and church-state separation.
12. | National Constitution Center | National Constitution Center | September 18, 2023
Explores the development of religious liberty and church-state relations from the founding era through modern constitutional disputes.
13. | The Washington Post | The Washington Post | May 19, 2023
Surveys competing definitions of Christian nationalism and explains why scholars, religious leaders, activists, and political figures often use the term differently.
14. | Brookings Institution and PRRI | Brookings Institution | February 8, 2023
Presents survey findings on Christian nationalism, democracy, religious identity, church-state separation, race, political violence, and national identity.
15. | PRRI | Public Religion Research Institute | 2023
Presents survey data measuring support for a Christian nation, Christian values in law, Christian identity as part of American identity, dominion theology, and strict church-state separation.
16. | Ruiqian Li and Paul Froese | Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion | 2023
Distinguishes religious traditionalism from Christian statism and shows that support for traditional Christianity does not necessarily imply support for increased governmental religious authority.
17. | Edward Lempinen | UC Berkeley | September 20, 2022
Interviews scholars about Christian nationalism's historical development, its relationship with evangelical politics, and debates over pluralism and democratic institutions.
18. | UC Berkeley Social Science Matrix | University of California, Berkeley | 2022
Discusses research by Philip Gorski and Samuel Perry on white Christian nationalism, American identity, political institutions, race, and democracy.
19. | Gregory A. Smith | Pew Research Center | October 28, 2021
Measures American support for church-state separation alongside attitudes toward declaring Christianity the official religion, school prayer, religious symbols, and government religious expression.
20. | Douglas Laycock | National Constitution Center | September 15, 2015
Examines founding-era debates over established churches, religious taxation, freedom of conscience, and the origins of the First Amendment's Religion Clauses.
21. | Marci A. Hamilton and Michael McConnell | National Constitution Center | n.d.
Presents both shared constitutional principles and contrasting scholarly interpretations of the Establishment Clause, illustrating disagreements over how extensive church-state separation should be.
22. | Yale Divinity School | Reflections | n.d.
Uses Roger Williams's defense of religious liberty to explore early arguments for institutional separation between civil government and religious authority.
23. | Miroslav Volf, Andrew Whitehead, and Samuel Perry | Yale Center for Faith & Culture | n.d.
Discusses sociological research on Christian nationalism and the distinction between Christian faith, patriotism, national identity, and governmental privilege for Christianity.
Historical Origins of Church-State Separation
24. | First Amendment Encyclopedia | The Free Speech Center | July 2, 2024
Reviews the origins of the wall-of-separation metaphor in Roger Williams and Thomas Jefferson and its later use by the Supreme Court.
25. | Jared A. Goldstein | Hastings Law Journal | 2017
Traces recurring movements seeking to define the United States as a Christian nation, from nineteenth-century Christian Amendment advocates through the modern Christian Right.
26. | Christopher S. Grenda | Politics and Religion | June 2013
Critiques evolving historical narratives used to justify broad separationist interpretations of the Establishment Clause.
27. | David E. Steinberg | Cleveland State Law Review | 2011
Argues that the original Establishment Clause primarily restricted federal interference with state religious arrangements rather than creating the modern understanding of complete church-state separation.
28. | W. Clark Gilpin | Church History | November 26, 2010
Reviews historians' treatment of the church-state wall and compares Jefferson's formulation with earlier ideas about institutional religious independence.
29. | Richard W. Pointer | Journal of American History | December 1, 2003
Reviews Daniel Dreisbach's scholarship questioning expansive uses of Jefferson's wall metaphor and placing the Danbury Baptist letter in its historical setting.
30. | John Witte Jr. | Michigan Law Review | May 2003
Surveys the historical development of separationist thought and argues for a more nuanced understanding of multiple founding-era principles of religious liberty.
31. | James Hutson | Library of Congress | June 1998
Examines Thomas Jefferson's 1802 letter to the Danbury Baptists and the historical circumstances surrounding his famous "wall of separation between church and state" phrase.
32. | Christian History Institute | Christian History Magazine | n.d.
Discusses the Danbury Baptists, Jefferson's letter, and competing historical interpretations of what Jefferson intended his church-state "wall" to accomplish.
33. | Congressional Research Service | Constitution Annotated / Congress.gov | n.d.
Reviews early interpretations of the Religion Clauses, Madison's actions, the Treaty of Tripoli, and unsuccessful proposals to amend the Constitution to identify the United States as Christian.
Supreme Court and Establishment Clause Doctrine
34. | Richard C. Osborne III | Catholic University Law Review | 2026
Examines the Supreme Court's reliance on "history and tradition" in Establishment Clause cases and questions how courts should identify constitutionally relevant historical traditions.
35. | Steven T. Collis | Texas Law Review Online | 2026
Analyzes uncertainty in post-Kennedy Establishment Clause doctrine and discusses difficulties lower courts encounter when applying the Supreme Court's history-and-tradition standard.
36. | Congressional Research Service | Congressional Research Service | August 22, 2025
Surveys post-Kennedy Establishment Clause cases involving government support for religion and analyzes how lower courts have applied history, coercion, neutrality, and existing Supreme Court precedents.
37. | Alexandra Zaretsky | First Amendment Studies | October 30, 2024
Analyzes Kennedy and Carson and argues that the decisions significantly changed, but did not eliminate, constitutional boundaries between religion and government.
38. | Tyler Ashman | University of Chicago Law Review Online | April 9, 2024
Analyzes the Supreme Court's turn toward originalist and historical reasoning in Kennedy and explores unresolved questions about how the new Establishment Clause test should operate.
39. | Christopher C. Lund | Michigan Law Review | April 2024
Examines whether religious favoritism and governmental coercion provide separate constitutional bases for Establishment Clause violations after the Supreme Court abandoned the Lemon test.
40. | Tavia Bruxellas McAlister | Nebraska Law Review Bulletin | March 23, 2024
Argues for interpreting the Establishment Clause primarily through founding-era understandings of legal coercion rather than the broader separationist doctrines developed during the twentieth century.
41. | Stephanie H. Barclay | Iowa Law Review | July 15, 2023
Examines how Kennedy v. Bremerton replaced the Lemon framework with an approach based on historical practices and understandings and considers its implications for both Establishment and Free Exercise Clause doctrine.
42. | Stephen Vukovits | University of Chicago Law Review Online | January 17, 2023
Examines whether Kennedy undermined the doctrine allowing people to bring Establishment Clause lawsuits based on direct exposure to allegedly unconstitutional governmental religious displays or practices.
43. | Stephen M. Feldman | Seton Hall Law Review | 2023
Examines the political mainstreaming of white Christian nationalism and considers implications for Supreme Court doctrine and competing understandings of religious freedom.
44. | Amy Howe | SCOTUSblog | June 27, 2022
Explains the Kennedy decision, including the majority's protection of the coach's religious exercise and the dissent's concerns about student coercion and government-sponsored religion.
45. | Oyez | Oyez | June 21, 2022
Summarizes Carson v. Makin, where the Court held that Maine could not exclude religious schools from an otherwise generally available tuition-assistance program.
46. | U.S. Supreme Court | Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School | 2022
Provides the opinions in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, which emphasized free exercise and historical practices while formally abandoning Lemon and the endorsement test.
47. | Harvard Law Review | Harvard Law Review | 2022
Examines Carson v. Makin and Kennedy v. Bremerton in the context of the Supreme Court's changing treatment of religion, education, government funding, and public schools.
48. | Patrick M. Garry | Nebraska Law Review | 2020
Argues that some broad interpretations of nonestablishment risk excluding religious viewpoints from public institutions and considers the relationship between neutrality and separation.
49. | Pew Research Center | Pew Research Center | October 3, 2019
Reviews major Supreme Court decisions concerning prayer, Bible reading, religious expression, student religious groups, and teaching about religion in public schools.
50. | Michael J. Perry | Emory University School of Law | July 17, 2019
Analyzes American Legion v. American Humanist Association and the Supreme Court's treatment of longstanding religious monuments on public property.
51. | Alex J. Luchenitser and Sarah R. Goetz | Catholic University Law Review | 2019
Critiques deciding Establishment Clause cases primarily by comparison with historical practices and argues that history alone may provide insufficient protection for modern religious pluralism.
52. | Nathan S. Chapman | William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal | 2015
Examines the relationship between state action, historical establishments of religion, and the Supreme Court's decision upholding legislative prayer in Town of Greece v. Galloway.
53. | Patrick M. Garry | ConLawNOW | 2015
Analyzes Town of Greece v. Galloway and competing understandings of legislative prayer, coercion, historical practice, and the Establishment Clause.
54. | U.S. Supreme Court | Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School | May 5, 2014
Provides the Town of Greece v. Galloway opinions, which upheld sectarian legislative prayer under a history-and-tradition approach while debating coercion and religious preference.
55. | Cynthia V. Ward | UC Davis Law Review | 2006
Examines the role of governmental coercion and individual choice in Establishment Clause jurisprudence, particularly in disputes involving schools and religious participation.
56. | James A. Campbell | Akron Law Review | 2006
Uses litigation over the Pledge of Allegiance to examine standing, religious references in government, ceremonial religion, and competing approaches to church-state separation.
57. | U.S. Supreme Court | Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School | 2005
Summarizes McCreary County v. ACLU, which invalidated courthouse Ten Commandments displays after examining their purpose and history.
Summarizes Marsh v. Chambers, which upheld legislative chaplaincy based substantially on the country's historical tradition of legislative prayer.
Summarizes Stone v. Graham, where the Supreme Court invalidated Kentucky's requirement that the Ten Commandments be posted in public-school classrooms.
Summarizes Lemon v. Kurtzman, which created the three-part Lemon test governing government purpose, religious effects, and excessive entanglement before that framework was later abandoned by the Court.
61. | Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts | U.S. Courts | 1962
Summarizes Engel v. Vitale, in which the Supreme Court held that government-written prayer in public schools violates the Establishment Clause.
62. | Maya Gardner | South Carolina Law Review | n.d.
Traces Establishment Clause doctrine concerning public schools from released-time programs and school prayer through Kennedy and applies the changing doctrine to recent state religious-education initiatives.
Reviews Supreme Court decisions using historical practices and traditions to evaluate legislative prayer, religious monuments, government ceremonies, and other Establishment Clause disputes.
Religion and Public Schools
64. | Kelsy Mittauer | CBS Texas | August 26, 2026
Investigates the role of a national Christian organization in legislation requiring Texas public schools to accommodate off-campus Bible instruction programs.
65. | U.S. Department of Education | U.S. Department of Education | February 5, 2026
Announces updated federal guidance distinguishing protected private religious expression in public schools from prayer or religious activity sponsored by school officials.
66. | U.S. Department of Education | U.S. Department of Education | February 5, 2026
Provides detailed federal guidance on student prayer, employee prayer, religious clubs, religious literature, teaching about religion, and government neutrality.
67. | Molly Gaines | Americans United for Separation of Church and State | December 1, 2025
Examines expansion of released-time Bible programs that allow students to leave public schools for privately operated religious instruction.
68. | Kevin J. Burke and Heidi Hadley | National Education Policy Center | November 4, 2025
Examines Christian nationalism's relationship to public-school policy, curriculum disputes, parental-rights activism, book restrictions, and efforts to promote Christianity through education.
69. | Heather L. Weaver | American Civil Liberties Union | September 4, 2025
Reviews state initiatives involving Bible instruction, Ten Commandments displays, prayer, and chaplains and presents the ACLU's Establishment Clause objections.
70. | Brock Lewis | Discover Education | May 7, 2025
Studies Christian nationalism in Christian schooling and considers its wider influence on public education, curriculum controversies, and religious inclusion.
71. | Kiara Alfonseca | ABC News | July 31, 2024
Reports resistance by Oklahoma school districts to a state directive calling for Bible instruction and describes the constitutional disagreement over teaching religion in public schools.
72. | Annie Xia | The Texas Tribune | April 5, 2024
Examines implementation of Texas legislation allowing school districts to employ chaplains and reports differing views among administrators, religious leaders, and professional counselors.
73. | Heather L. Weaver | American Civil Liberties Union | March 15, 2024
Presents civil-liberties arguments against allowing school chaplains to perform counseling functions and discusses religious neutrality, qualifications, and student coercion.
74. | American Civil Liberties Union | ACLU | 2024
Reports opposition from chaplains, religious organizations, and civil-rights groups to state proposals authorizing chaplains to serve in public schools.
75. | Ohio School Boards Association | Ohio School Boards Association | 2024
Reviews Ohio law and constitutional rules governing students leaving public schools during the school day for privately sponsored religious instruction.
76. | U.S. Department of Education | U.S. Department of Education | 2024
Answers common questions concerning voluntary prayer, school-sponsored prayer, employee religious expression, religious clubs, moments of silence, and academic teaching about religion.
77. | Modern American History | Cambridge University Press | July 2023
Examines the 1990s shift from government-sponsored school prayer toward student religious-expression claims and connects that history to later debates over Christian nationalism.
78. | Samuel L. Perry | Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion | May 22, 2023
Examines associations between Christian nationalism and support for mandatory patriotic education, American exceptionalism, and particular presentations of national history.
79. | Authors | Laws | November 30, 2021
Examines First Amendment tensions facing public educators and discusses Christian nationalism in relation to speech, religion, and public-school employment.
80. | First Amendment Encyclopedia | The Free Speech Center | April 3, 2020
Reviews a New Jersey case finding that distributing Gideon Bibles through public schools violated church-state separation principles.
81. | Amanda Tyler | Religion News Service | January 17, 2020
Argues from a Baptist religious-liberty perspective that voluntary student prayer is protected while government-directed religious exercises should remain constitutionally restricted.
82. | Oyez | Oyez | June 19, 2000
Summarizes Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe, which held that school-authorized student prayer over a football stadium public-address system violated the Establishment Clause.
Summarizes Edwards v. Aguillard, which struck down Louisiana's requirement that creation science be taught whenever evolution was taught.
Summarizes Board of Education v. Allen, where the Court upheld lending secular textbooks to students attending religious schools.
85. | Anti-Defamation League | ADL | n.d.
Explains the constitutional framework governing released-time religious instruction and distinguishes programs conducted away from public-school property from school-sponsored religious education.
86. | Released Time Religious Education | ReleasedTime.org | n.d.
Presents the perspective of organizations supporting released-time religious education and explains their view of its constitutional basis and historical development.
87. | LifeWise Academy | LifeWise Academy | n.d.
Explains how a major Christian released-time organization structures Bible classes off school property during the public-school day.
88. | LifeWise Academy | LifeWise Academy | n.d.
Presents the organization's advocacy for released-time Bible education and its arguments concerning parental choice and religious instruction.
89. | Stop Hate in Schools | Stop Hate in Schools | n.d.
Examines released-time religious instruction from a critical perspective and considers its effects on school schedules, inclusion, and relationships between public schools and religious organizations.
Ten Commandments, Religious Symbols, and Public Institutions
90. | American Civil Liberties Union | ACLU | August 17, 2026
Describes families' request for Supreme Court review of Texas's Ten Commandments law and summarizes the competing constitutional arguments surrounding classroom religious displays.
91. | April Towery | Houston Press | August 10, 2026
Reports on disputes surrounding Ten Commandments displays and other efforts to increase Christian material in Texas public schools.
92. | First Amendment Encyclopedia | The Free Speech Center | May 11, 2026
Surveys constitutional litigation involving Ten Commandments displays in schools, courthouses, capitols, and other government settings.
93. | Americans United for Separation of Church and State | Americans United | April 21, 2026
Tracks litigation over Texas laws requiring Ten Commandments displays in public-school classrooms and summarizes competing rulings in federal court.
94. | American Civil Liberties Union | ACLU | March 16, 2026
Reports the permanent injunction against Arkansas's Ten Commandments requirement and describes the court's reasoning under current Establishment Clause precedent.
95. | Associated Press | AP News | March 2026
Reports a federal ruling against Arkansas's Ten Commandments requirement and places the case alongside similar disputes in Louisiana and Texas.
96. | Reuters | Reuters | February 20, 2026
Reports the Fifth Circuit's treatment of Louisiana's Ten Commandments law and explains the changing procedural and constitutional landscape surrounding the requirement.
97. | Stephanie Barclay | SCOTUSblog | January 23, 2026
Presents a legal argument for evaluating recent Ten Commandments laws under the Supreme Court's history-focused Establishment Clause precedents rather than the former Lemon test.
98. | Richard Garnett | SCOTUSblog | January 22, 2026
Uses a Massachusetts controversy over religious statues at a government building to examine continuing uncertainty about religious symbols and constitutional church-state boundaries.
99. | Interfaith Alliance | Interfaith Alliance | 2026
Presents objections from Christian, Jewish, and other faith leaders to proposed Tennessee classroom-display legislation on religious-liberty and church-state grounds.
100. | American Civil Liberties Union | ACLU | November 18, 2025
Reports litigation resulting in an order requiring several Texas school districts to remove mandated Ten Commandments displays while constitutional challenges continued.
101. | Haajrah Gilani | Houston Chronicle | August 24, 2025
Examines historical claims that the Ten Commandments directly shaped American law and presents scholarly debate over the purpose of mandatory classroom displays.
102. | Richard Garnett | SCOTUSblog | August 20, 2025
Presents an argument that religiously significant material can also serve secular governmental purposes and considers how that principle might apply to Ten Commandments classroom displays.
103. | American Civil Liberties Union | ACLU | August 20, 2025
Reports a federal injunction against enforcement of Texas's Ten Commandments classroom law in participating school districts.
104. | American Civil Liberties Union | ACLU | August 4, 2025
Reports a federal ruling temporarily blocking Arkansas's classroom-display requirement and summarizes the constitutional issues considered by the court.
105. | Kelsey Dallas | SCOTUSblog | July 15, 2025
Reviews new state laws requiring Ten Commandments displays and explains how Kennedy's rejection of Lemon has created new uncertainty surrounding Stone v. Graham.
106. | American Civil Liberties Union | ACLU | June 11, 2025
Describes a multifaith lawsuit challenging Arkansas's Ten Commandments requirement and summarizes the plaintiffs' Establishment Clause, Free Exercise, and parental-rights arguments.
107. | Texas Legislature | Texas Legislature | June 3, 2025
Provides the official legislative analysis of Texas Senate Bill 10 and explains supporters' reliance on recent Supreme Court Establishment Clause decisions.
108. | First Amendment Encyclopedia | The Free Speech Center | March 28, 2025
Reviews the origins and constitutional treatment of "In God We Trust" as the national motto and its role in church-state litigation.
109. | Robert Downen | The Texas Tribune | March 17, 2025
Reports on Texas legislative proposals involving the Ten Commandments, school prayer, Christian-oriented curriculum, vouchers, and arguments challenging traditional understandings of church-state separation.
110. | Jeffrey Michael Marchese | American Bar Association | 2025
Reviews litigation over Louisiana's Ten Commandments law and explains arguments concerning historical practice, coercion, religious favoritism, and public-school displays.
111. | ACLU of Louisiana | ACLU of Louisiana | November 12, 2024
Reports the federal district court decision initially blocking Louisiana's Ten Commandments mandate and summarizes the plaintiffs' church-state arguments.
112. | American Bar Association | American Bar Association | August 5, 2024
Reports the ABA House of Delegates' adoption of a policy opposing laws requiring Ten Commandments displays in public schools and discusses church-state concerns.
113. | The Texas Tribune | The Texas Tribune | July 19, 2024
Examines concerns that proposed Texas curriculum could favor Christianity and discusses the debate over Christian nationalism, religion education, and Establishment Clause limits.
114. | Tanner Stening | Northeastern Global News | June 24, 2024
Interviews a constitutional-law scholar about Louisiana's Ten Commandments mandate and discusses coercion, religious preference, and Stone v. Graham.
115. | American Civil Liberties Union | ACLU | June 24, 2024
Describes the original multifaith challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments law and summarizes arguments that mandatory displays improperly involve government in religious doctrine.
116. | Americans United for Separation of Church and State | Americans United | 2024
Describes litigation challenging Louisiana's requirement that public schools display the Ten Commandments and explains the plaintiffs' Establishment Clause arguments.
117. | Baker Institute | Rice University Baker Institute | 2024
Reviews Texas church-state legislation alongside Supreme Court cases including Kennedy v. Bremerton and discusses the Court's shift toward history-and-tradition analysis.
118. | Associated Press | AP News | 2024
Surveys efforts by lawmakers in several states to expand Christianity's role in public schools, including Bible instruction, religious displays, and school prayer.
119. | Author | Rhetoric Society Quarterly | 2022
Examines Christian nationalist involvement in the history of "In God We Trust" and argues that the motto has been used to support claims about America's Christian identity.
Religious Charter Schools and Public Funding
120. | Congressional Research Service | Congressional Research Service | July 22, 2025
Explains the Supreme Court's divided disposition in the Oklahoma charter-school case and the unresolved national questions concerning religious charter schools.
121. | Nevada Current | Nevada Current | May 26, 2025
Examines the broader debate about whether charter schools should be legally treated as public actors or private organizations for constitutional purposes.
122. | American Constitution Society | ACS | May 22, 2025
Reviews the Supreme Court's 4-4 disposition leaving Oklahoma's rejection of the proposed Catholic charter school in place without establishing nationwide precedent.
123. | The Guardian | The Guardian | May 22, 2025
Reports the Supreme Court's evenly divided ruling that left the Oklahoma Supreme Court's decision against St. Isidore in place.
124. | National Constitution Center | National Constitution Center | May 1, 2025
Presents competing constitutional perspectives on whether publicly funded charter schools may provide explicitly religious education.
125. | Gaya Gupta | The Washington Post | May 1, 2025
Examines the proposed St. Isidore curriculum and how explicitly Catholic instruction would operate within a publicly financed charter-school system.
126. | Amy Howe | SCOTUSblog | April 30, 2025
Reports Supreme Court oral arguments over St. Isidore and explores whether charter schools are government actors or private organizations entitled to equal religious participation.
127. | The Guardian | The Guardian | April 30, 2025
Reports Supreme Court arguments concerning St. Isidore and the dispute over whether religious charter schools are public institutions or private participants in government programs.
128. | The Washington Post | The Washington Post | April 28, 2025
Traces the legal and political path that brought the concept of a publicly funded religious charter school from Oklahoma to the Supreme Court.
129. | Oklahoma Voice | Oklahoma Voice | April 28, 2025
Reviews Oklahoma's debate over St. Isidore and competing claims about religious discrimination, public-school status, taxpayer funding, and church-state separation.
130. | Sean Murphy and Mark Sherman | Associated Press | April 2025
Explains the St. Isidore dispute, supporters' Free Exercise claims, opponents' Establishment Clause objections, and its potential implications for public education.
131. | Steven D. Schwinn | American Bar Association | March 26, 2025
Examines whether Oklahoma could require public charter schools to remain secular or whether excluding a religious operator violated the Free Exercise Clause.
132. | Education Next | Education Next | March 4, 2025
Presents a school-choice perspective on Catholic charter schools and discusses how current funding structures affect religious schools competing with tuition-free charter schools.
133. | John Kruzel | Reuters | January 24, 2025
Reports the Supreme Court's decision to hear the Oklahoma religious-charter-school dispute and explains the competing Free Exercise and Establishment Clause arguments.
134. | Legal Information Institute | Cornell Law School | 2025
Provides a legal overview of Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond and the constitutional question of whether states must permit religious charter schools.
135. | Notre Dame Religious Liberty Clinic | University of Notre Dame | 2025
Presents the legal case supporting St. Isidore, arguing that excluding religious organizations from Oklahoma's charter program constitutes religious discrimination.
136. | U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops | USCCB | 2025
Presents a Catholic institutional perspective supporting equal participation by religious organizations in publicly available educational programs.
137. | Oklahoma Supreme Court | Justia | June 25, 2024
Provides the Oklahoma Supreme Court opinion holding that the proposed St. Isidore Catholic virtual charter school conflicted with state law and constitutional provisions concerning religion.
Academic Research on Christian Nationalism and Government
138. | Ibrahim Enes Atac, Lena Kunjan, Forrest Lovette, and Samuel L. Perry | Socius | May 28, 2026
Studies the relationship between Christian nationalism and preferences concerning the purposes, beneficiaries, and priorities of government spending.
139. | Joel Day | Terrorism and Political Violence | September 11, 2025
Examines prayer as a public ritual within Christian-nationalist mobilization and analyzes how religious practice can sacralize political identity and political conflict.
140. | Ruiqian Li and Paul Froese | Socius | July 10, 2025
Distinguishes state-centered Christian statism from society-centered religious traditionalism and explores different views of how Christianity should interact with government.
Studies relationships between Christian nationalism and attitudes toward the Supreme Court, including support for religious considerations in judicial decision-making.
142. | Authors | Politics, Religion & Ideology | 2025
Traces historical connections between Christian nationalist rhetoric and organized white-supremacist movements such as British-Israelism and Christian Identity.
143. | Patrick Sawyer | William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal | 2024
Uses James Madison's understanding of religious establishment to argue for legal measures strengthening Establishment Clause protections against Christian nationalism.
144. | Nilay Saiya | Review of Faith & International Affairs | May 12, 2023
Places American Christian nationalism in a global comparative context and examines tensions between religious nationalism, pluralism, and democratic institutions.
145. | Author | The Sociological Quarterly | 2023
Investigates religious institutions, participation, fundamentalist beliefs, and political factors associated with support for Christian nationalism.
146. | Gillian Hart | Studies in Political Economy | June 30, 2021
Compares explanations centered on white evangelicalism and Christian nationalism and situates American developments within broader nationalism research.
147. | Caroline Mala Corbin | Alabama Law Review | 2020
Argues that government-sponsored Christian symbols and practices can reinforce Christian-nationalist conceptions of citizenship and examines the Supreme Court's role in those developments.
Religious, Denominational, Advocacy, and Competing Perspectives
148. | Andrew L. Seidel | Americans United for Separation of Church and State | September 17, 2026
Examines claims about the founders' personal Christianity and argues that individual religious beliefs do not establish that the Constitution created a Christian government.
149. | Richard D. Land | The Christian Post | September 4, 2026
Presents a Southern Baptist perspective on religious liberty and political leadership while disagreeing with proposals that could privilege Christian identity in public office.
150. | Megan Fowler | Christianity Today | July 30, 2026
Reports on Protestant denominations studying Christian nationalism and debating appropriate relationships among Christianity, national identity, and political institutions.
151. | NPR Illinois | NPR Illinois | May 25, 2026
Examines the changing relationship between religion and government in the United States and presents differing perspectives on Christian nationalism, religious freedom, and church-state separation.
152. | Religion News Service | Religion News Service | May 17, 2026
Uses early American denominational restrictions to challenge simplified claims that colonial Christianity amounted to a unified national Christian establishment.
153. | Jack Panyard | Christianity Today | May 14, 2026
Reports Pew's 2026 findings on Christian nationalism, religion's public influence, official Christianity, biblical law, and support for church-state separation.
154. | Amanda Tyler and Bill Leonard | Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty | April 16, 2026
Discusses the Constitution, Ten Commandments proposals, Baptist religious-liberty history, and Christian critiques of efforts to privilege Christianity through government.
155. | James B. Morgan | Liberty Journal of History | 2026
Reexamines the wall-of-separation metaphor from a Christian perspective and argues for a narrower interpretation of church-state separation than many modern separationists adopt.
156. | First Things | First Things | 2026
Presents a favorable intellectual argument for Christian nationalism, offering a contrasting perspective on Christianity, national identity, political authority, and the proper role of religion in public life.
157. | Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty | BJC | June 26, 2025
Examines Texas debates over Christianity in public schools and government and discusses them through Baptist traditions of religious liberty and church-state separation.
158. | Miguel A. Faria | RealClearReligion | April 21, 2025
Presents an opinion arguing that Jefferson's wall metaphor has been interpreted too expansively and should not be understood as excluding religion from public affairs.
159. | Brian Kaylor | Word&Way | April 10, 2025
Reports religious arguments for church-state separation and discusses Christian responses to Christian nationalism from Baptist and Black Christian perspectives.
160. | Mikale Olson | The Christian Post | March 30, 2025
Presents an evangelical Christian argument that institutional merger of church and state conflicts with both American constitutional traditions and Christian religious liberty.
161. | Religion News Service | Religion News Service | January 16, 2025
Discusses Jewish concerns about Christian nationalism while distinguishing religious participation in politics from government privileging a particular faith.
162. | Christianity Today | Christianity Today | March 2024
Warns against applying the Christian-nationalism label so broadly that ordinary religious participation in democratic debate becomes conflated with government-enforced religious privilege.
163. | Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty | BJC | March 2024
Examines when the term Christian nationalism is useful and when religious activity or political engagement may be mislabeled, emphasizing distinctions among belief, advocacy, and governmental privilege.
164. | Baptist News Global | Baptist News Global | 2024
Offers a Baptist theological critique of Christian nationalism centered on religious liberty, voluntary faith, and the historic Baptist defense of institutional church-state separation.
165. | Mitch Kokai | John Locke Foundation | August 4, 2023
Presents the argument that publicly supported religious charter schooling should be understood as equal treatment of religion rather than Christian nationalism.
166. | Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman | Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty | April 13, 2023
Discusses Christian-nationalism polling and explains a Baptist religious-liberty perspective that distinguishes Christian political participation from government privileging Christianity.
167. | Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty | BJC | March 20, 2023
Describes the Christians Against Christian Nationalism campaign and its theological and constitutional arguments against government privileging Christianity.
168. | Heritage Foundation | The Heritage Foundation | 2023
Argues that "Christian nationalism" is sometimes defined too broadly and can be used to characterize conventional conservative religious beliefs as antidemocratic or extremist.
169. | Adventist Review | Adventist Review | 2023
Examines how ordinary expressions of Christian identity and patriotism may overlap with Christian-nationalist ideas and argues for maintaining distinctions between faith and national power.
170. | Adventist Review | Adventist Review | 2023
Presents a Seventh-day Adventist critique of efforts to use governmental power to advance Christianity, emphasizing the denomination's historical concern for religious liberty.
171. | Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty | BJC | December 15, 2022
Discusses congressional testimony concerning Christian nationalism, religious freedom, January 6, and the constitutional relationship between church and government.
172. | Russell Moore | Christianity Today | September 29, 2022
Critiques Christian nationalism on theological grounds and argues that Christianity should not be fused with governmental or nationalist power.
173. | Americans United for Separation of Church and State | Americans United | 2022
Presents historical arguments against the claim that the United States was legally founded as a Christian nation, including the Treaty of Tripoli and nineteenth-century Christian Amendment campaigns.
174. | First Liberty Institute | First Liberty Institute | 2022
Argues that the Christian-nationalism label can be applied too broadly to constitutionally protected religious expression and ordinary participation by religious citizens in public affairs.
175. | Paul D. Miller | Christianity Today | February 3, 2021
Defines Christian nationalism from an evangelical Christian perspective and distinguishes it from Christianity, patriotism, ordinary political participation, and religious freedom.
176. | First Things | First Things | 2020
Explores competing senses in which the United States might be described as culturally or historically Christian while distinguishing those claims from a formal established church.
177. | Russell Kirk | The Heritage Foundation | 1988
Argues that the Establishment Clause prohibited a national established church without requiring religion to be excluded from American public life.
178. | National Constitution Center | National Constitution Center | 1947
Reviews Everson v. Board of Education, the foundational modern case applying the Establishment Clause to state governments and invoking Jefferson's wall metaphor.
179. | Christian History Institute | Christian History Magazine | n.d.
Describes Baptist struggles against established churches and the historical background of Jefferson's response to the Danbury Baptist Association.
180. | Origins | Ohio State University | n.d.
Reviews historical evidence showing both institutional separation and substantial religious presence in early American public life, complicating simple accounts of the founding.
Contemporary Church-State Conflicts and Analysis
181. | Freedom From Religion Foundation | FFRF | September 17, 2026
Discusses legal disputes involving Christian nationalism, public-school curriculum, Ten Commandments requirements, religious programs, and parental-rights campaigns.
182. | Mark Silk | Religion News Service | September 11, 2026
Examines a contemporary Southern Baptist debate over Christian nationalism and the denomination's historic relationship with church-state separation.
183. | Religion News Service | Religion News Service | August 18, 2026
Interviews a member of Congress about Christian nationalism, religious privilege, pluralism, and the importance he assigns to institutional separation between religion and government.
184. | Sojourners | Sojourners | July 2026
Investigates Christian-nationalist influence in military institutions and raises questions about chaplaincy, religious organizations, command authority, and church-state boundaries.
185. | Mark Silk | Religion News Service | October 29, 2025
Reviews Oklahoma disputes involving Bible instruction, a proposed religious charter school, the Ten Commandments, and state constitutional protections concerning public support of religion.
186. | Rob Boston | Americans United for Separation of Church and State | August 18, 2025
Argues that Christian-nationalist activism is influencing public schools through religious displays, curriculum controversies, vouchers, and school governance.
187. | National Catholic Reporter | National Catholic Reporter | 2025
Reports scholarship and religious discussion about Christian nationalism, including survey trends concerning school prayer, government promotion of Christianity, and church-state separation.
188. | Amanda Tyler and Bill Leonard | Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty | November 7, 2024
Discusses Louisiana Ten Commandments displays, Oklahoma Bible instruction, public schools, and Baptist arguments for religious liberty and church-state separation.
189. | Andrew Silow-Carroll | Jewish Telegraphic Agency | June 30, 2024
Interviews legal scholar Noah Feldman about Ten Commandments mandates, Christian nationalism, religious pluralism, and changing Establishment Clause doctrine.
190. | Baptist News Global | Baptist News Global | February 2024
Discusses the documentary "God & Country" and its examination of claims that America is a Christian nation and that church-state separation lacks constitutional legitimacy.
191. | Freedom From Religion Foundation | FFRF | 2024
Interprets Pew polling on Christian nationalism, Bible-based law, official Christianity, and public attitudes toward enforcement of church-state separation.
192. | Baptist News Global | Baptist News Global | 2024
Surveys how mainline Protestant denominations are responding to Christian nationalism and discusses recent Supreme Court decisions affecting religion and government.
193. | Esther Prins, Mary Juzwik, and Gonca Acaray | Penn State / Educational Studies | 2024
Analyzes Christian-nationalist themes in a Pennsylvania school-board campaign and examines how religious and national identity were deployed in local education politics.
194. | Bob Smietana | Religion News Service | January 6, 2023
Describes different networks and ideological tendencies grouped under the Christian-nationalism label, highlighting differences among advocates rather than treating the movement as monolithic.
195. | Baptist News Global | Baptist News Global | 2023
Reports a panel comparing religious nationalism historically and discussing theological and political risks associated with close institutional alignment between religion and government.
196. | Brian Kaylor and Beau Underwood | Word&Way | June 23, 2022
Traces religious-right criticism of church-state separation and discusses contemporary Supreme Court rulings that altered the balance between Establishment and Free Exercise claims.
197. | Freedom From Religion Foundation and Baptist Joint Committee | FFRF / BJC | 2022
Introduces a joint report examining Christian-nationalist beliefs, symbols, organizations, and rhetoric surrounding January 6 and relating them to broader questions of religious identity and government.
198. | Religion News Service | Religion News Service | June 2, 2020
Uses survey research and a high-profile public Bible display to discuss how Christian-nationalist attitudes connect religious symbolism, government authority, and national identity.
199. | Michelle Goldberg | Freedom From Religion Foundation | February 28, 2007
Describes an earlier phase of Christian-nationalist activism and its efforts to challenge church-state separation across government, education, and public institutions.
200. | Americans United for Separation of Church and State | Americans United | n.d.
Collects historical materials defending church-state separation and responding to claims that the United States was constitutionally founded as a Christian state.
