The Politics of Archives
- NOTOC**
The Politics of Archives
Archives are often presented as neutral institutions that preserve documents, photographs, recordings, government files, and other evidence from the past. In practice, however, archives are shaped by political, institutional, cultural, and economic decisions. Choices about which records are created, collected, preserved, described, digitized, restricted, displayed, or destroyed influence how societies understand history.
Archival power operates at every stage of the historical record. Governments, corporations, universities, museums, religious institutions, colonial administrations, social movements, families, and individuals all determine what evidence survives. Archivists and other memory workers further shape the record through appraisal, classification, description, preservation, access policies, exhibitions, and digitization.
The resulting archive is therefore not a complete reflection of the past. It is a constructed body of evidence containing both records and silences. Studying the politics of archives means examining not only what collections contain, but also what is missing, who controlled the records, whose language was used to describe them, who can access them, and whose interests their preservation serves.
Archival Power, Theory, and Silences
Critical archival scholarship challenges the assumption that archives simply store objective historical facts. Records are created within relationships of power and are preserved through institutional systems that reflect particular political priorities, professional traditions, and social values.
Archival silences may emerge because marginalized people were prevented from creating records, because institutions considered their experiences unimportant, or because evidence was deliberately censored, destroyed, hidden, or excluded. Silence can also result from privacy, trauma, oral traditions, strategic secrecy, or a community’s decision not to surrender sensitive knowledge to an institution.
Description and classification systems can reinforce these inequalities. Catalog terms may reproduce racist, colonial, sexist, or otherwise discriminatory language. Administrative categories can reduce complex identities to labels created by states or other authorities. Search tools and finding aids then influence which people and events researchers can locate.
Postmodern, feminist, critical race, and decolonial theories have encouraged archivists to acknowledge their own authority rather than claiming complete neutrality. These approaches emphasize transparency, accountability, plurality, community participation, and recognition of the archive as a site of continuing political struggle.
Colonialism and Decolonizing Archives
Colonial archives were created as instruments of administration, surveillance, mapping, taxation, racial classification, land seizure, policing, and governance. Their records often describe colonized peoples through the language and priorities of imperial officials rather than through the knowledge of the communities being documented.
Decolonizing an archive involves more than adding overlooked names to existing catalogs. It may require revising harmful descriptions, investigating provenance, reconnecting dispersed collections, returning records or cultural materials, supporting Indigenous and community control, and questioning institutional ownership inherited from colonial rule.
Digital repatriation can provide communities with copies of photographs, recordings, manuscripts, and other materials held elsewhere. However, digital access does not necessarily resolve questions of legal ownership, physical return, cultural authority, or control over future use. Effective decolonial practice requires long-term partnerships and meaningful transfers of decision-making power.
Researchers also have responsibilities when working with colonial records. They must consider how the archive was created, whose voices were filtered through colonial administration, what violence shaped the collection, and whether reproducing records could cause further harm.
Community Archives and Archival Activism
Community archives are created and governed by communities seeking to preserve their own histories outside, or in partnership with, mainstream institutions. They are often established in response to exclusion, displacement, discrimination, political repression, cultural loss, or the failure of official archives to represent everyday community life.
These collections may document social movements, neighborhoods, immigrant communities, labor struggles, religious groups, racial and ethnic communities, LGBTQ+ communities, unhoused people, artists, activists, and others whose experiences have been neglected by state or academic repositories.
Community archiving frequently combines preservation with activism. It can strengthen collective identity, teach political history, support organizing, protect evidence, challenge stereotypes, and enable people to imagine different futures. Community archivists may view relationships, trust, cultural knowledge, and care as equally important as professional technical standards.
Partnerships with major institutions can provide funding, preservation support, and wider access. They can also threaten community autonomy if institutions acquire collections, impose professional standards, control interpretation, or separate materials from the people who created them. Ethical collaboration therefore requires shared authority and respect for a community’s right to retain ownership and make decisions about access.
Indigenous Archival Sovereignty
Indigenous archival sovereignty is based on the principle that Indigenous peoples have the right to govern records, data, cultural knowledge, images, recordings, ancestral materials, and other information concerning their communities.
Conventional archival practices have often treated open access as an unquestioned public good. Indigenous knowledge systems may instead require culturally specific rules based on kinship, ceremony, gender, season, community membership, sacred responsibility, or restrictions established by knowledge holders.
Indigenous-led systems such as Mukurtu and Traditional Knowledge labels demonstrate how digital tools can support local protocols rather than imposing universal access rules. These systems allow communities to define who may view materials, how knowledge should be attributed, and what cultural responsibilities accompany its use.
Repatriation is also understood as a relational process rather than simply a transfer of property. Returning recordings, photographs, manuscripts, and other materials can support language revitalization, cultural continuity, community wellbeing, land claims, education, governance, and connections between present generations and their ancestors.
Black Archives and Racial Justice
Black archives preserve histories that have frequently been ignored, distorted, removed, or inadequately represented within national and institutional collections. They document intellectual traditions, political organizing, migration, labor, family life, art, religion, feminism, anticolonial movements, resistance, and everyday experiences across the African diaspora.
Black memory workers often bring lived experience, cultural knowledge, and community relationships to archival practice. Their work challenges professional models that portray emotional connection or political commitment as incompatible with archival responsibility.
Black feminist archives have been particularly important in preserving the work of women whose papers were undervalued or dispersed. These projects treat preservation as a form of care, political education, and resistance to historical erasure.
Digital preservation has expanded access to Black history but also creates new vulnerabilities. Websites may disappear, social-media platforms may remove content, institutions may alter public information, and digital projects may lose funding. Preserving the Black web therefore requires both technical infrastructure and sustained community governance.
Feminist, Queer, and Trans Archives
Feminist, queer, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and gender-diverse archives challenge historical systems that rendered many lives invisible or described them through hostile medical, legal, religious, or criminal categories.
These archives preserve publications, personal papers, oral histories, photographs, protest materials, artwork, correspondence, organizational records, and digital culture. They provide evidence of political struggle while also documenting friendship, intimacy, creativity, survival, community formation, and everyday life.
Feminist archival theory emphasizes relationships, emotion, embodiment, care, labor, intersectionality, and the power dynamics surrounding record creation. Queer archival approaches question rigid classification systems and recognize identities as changing, contested, and resistant to fixed categories.
Sensitive collections raise difficult ethical questions. Public access can support historical recognition, but it may also expose people who did not consent to disclosure. Archivists must consider privacy, safety, trauma, family relationships, political repression, and the possibility that historical terminology could reproduce harm.
Human Rights, State Violence, and Transitional Justice
Archives are essential to investigations of dictatorship, genocide, forced disappearance, slavery, colonial violence, war crimes, police abuse, political imprisonment, and other human-rights violations. Records can support criminal prosecutions, truth commissions, reparations, memorialization, institutional reform, and recognition of victims.
Evidence may include government files, court documents, military records, photographs, testimonies, forensic reports, organizational records, and materials collected by activists or journalists. Such records are often fragmented, deliberately concealed, or endangered by political transitions.
Archives do not automatically produce justice. Governments may restrict access, perpetrators may control documentation, institutions may prioritize national reconciliation over accountability, and legal systems may exclude forms of evidence valued by affected communities.
Researchers working with records of violence must consider consent, privacy, exposure, retraumatization, and the consequences of turning human suffering into academic or public material. Survivor communities should have meaningful roles in decisions about preservation, description, interpretation, and access.
State Archives, Secrecy, and Public Access
Government archives are central to democratic accountability because they preserve evidence of how public officials exercised power. Records laws can establish public ownership of official documents, regulate preservation, and provide eventual access to presidential, ministerial, military, intelligence, and administrative records.
These protections are frequently challenged by secrecy, political interference, poor recordkeeping, privatized communications, encrypted messaging, destruction of documents, restrictive classification, and the removal of public information from government websites.
National archives may become sites of political conflict when leaders seek to influence exhibitions, descriptions, access decisions, staffing, or institutional leadership. Attempts to soften controversial history or eliminate politically inconvenient records can reshape national memory.
Freedom-of-information laws are valuable only when governments reliably create, organize, preserve, and disclose records. Transparency initiatives cannot compensate for evidence that was never created, was improperly transferred, or has been destroyed.
Digital Archives, Web Memory, and Algorithms
Digital archives have expanded access to historical materials, but digitization is never neutral. Institutions decide which collections receive funding, which documents are scanned, what metadata is created, and which interfaces or search systems users must navigate.
Search rankings, optical character recognition, automated transcription, and artificial-intelligence systems can reproduce archival inequalities. Historical records containing biased language may shape automated tools, while poorly represented communities may remain difficult to find in digitized collections.
Artificial intelligence may help identify overlooked names, review sensitive material, transcribe documents, and reveal patterns across large collections. Its use requires transparency, human oversight, professional judgment, and collaboration with the communities represented in the records.
Web archives face additional problems because online material is unstable. Pages are altered or removed, platforms disappear, redirects fail, and archived websites may lose their original interactive context. Emergency web-preservation projects have therefore become important when political administrations rapidly remove public data or historical information.
Digital abundance does not eliminate archival silence. It can create new forms of absence by privileging well-funded institutions, dominant languages, popular platforms, and communities with reliable access to technology.
National Memory, Museums, and Restitution
Archives, museums, and libraries help construct national memory through the stories they preserve and display. Exhibitions, catalogs, educational programs, and public monuments determine which events are presented as central to national identity and which are minimized or excluded.
Many museum and archival collections were acquired through colonial conquest, military looting, coercive excavation, racial science, unequal trade, or the removal of human remains. Restitution debates question legal systems that recognize institutions as legitimate owners while overlooking the violence through which collections were obtained.
Provenance research can reveal how objects and records changed hands, but institutions often control the funding, documentation, and terms of negotiation. Restitution processes may reproduce inequality unless communities and countries of origin possess meaningful authority.
Return can include physical restitution, transfer of legal ownership, digital repatriation, shared stewardship, long-term loans, or renewed access. Critics caution that symbolic returns should not substitute for structural reform, while supporters view restitution as part of historical repair, cultural renewal, and the rebuilding of relationships.
Ethical Archival Practice
Ethical archival practice requires more than technical preservation. It involves confronting unequal power between institutions, record creators, communities, researchers, and the people represented in collections.
Archivists can make collection histories transparent, identify harmful terminology, acknowledge gaps, involve communities in decision-making, protect vulnerable people, and create mechanisms for correction or reinterpretation. Institutions can also provide resources without requiring communities to surrender ownership.
Access should be balanced with privacy, cultural protocols, security, and the possibility of future harm. Universal openness may benefit researchers while exposing survivors, activists, Indigenous knowledge holders, or politically vulnerable communities.
Ethical archives recognize that preservation, restriction, return, deletion, and refusal can all carry political consequences. The appropriate response depends on context, relationships, consent, and the authority of affected communities.
Conclusion
Archives do not merely preserve history after it happens. They participate in producing the historical record and determining what future generations will be able to know.
The politics of archives can be seen in colonial records, national repositories, community collections, Indigenous knowledge systems, digital platforms, human-rights documentation, museum restitution disputes, and campaigns to protect government information. In each case, preservation is connected to questions of ownership, authority, access, identity, justice, and memory.
A more democratic archival future requires institutions to acknowledge their power, document their own decisions, confront historical harms, and share authority with the people whose lives and knowledge their collections contain. It also requires sustained support for community-led archives, Indigenous sovereignty, digital preservation, public accountability, and the recovery of histories threatened by neglect or deliberate erasure.
- TOC**
Archival Power, Theory, and Silences
Archives: Preserving History or Power?
| University of Lincoln Library | Grains of Knowledge | 2025-03-18
Introduces archives as institutions that both preserve evidence and reproduce authority through decisions about collecting, description, access, omission, and whose experiences become historically visible.
Mind the Gap: On Archival Politics and Historical Theory in the Digital Age
| G. Gaber | Rethinking History | 2025
Examines how digital archives reshape historical theory, emphasizing that digitization, interfaces, selection, and search systems embed political judgments rather than simply expanding neutral access.
The Power of Provenance in the Records Continuum
| Chris Hurley, Sue McKemmish, Barbara Reed, and Narissa Timbery | Archival Science | 2024-10-07
Reconsiders provenance as a socially situated relationship rather than a fixed technical rule, showing how context, power, and continuing record use shape archival meaning.
Archiving Against Professionalism
| Lia Warner | RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts, and Cultural Heritage | 2024
Challenges professional norms that separate archivists from political struggle, arguing for practices grounded in solidarity, collective responsibility, and resistance to institutionalized exclusion.
Critical Archives
| Karin Wulf and Amanda Strauss | The Scholarly Kitchen | 2023-08-24
Explains why archives require critical reading, highlighting acquisition histories, institutional priorities, descriptive choices, missing records, and unequal power between record creators and researchers.
Critical Archival Studies: An Introduction
Defines critical archival studies as an emancipatory field concerned with how records and repositories participate in oppression, resistance, representation, accountability, and social transformation.
Opening Possibilities for Addressing Neoliberalism in the Archival Field
| Marika Cifor and Jamie A. Lee | Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies | 2017
Invites archivists to examine how market logic, austerity, managerialism, precarity, and privatization influence archival labor, institutional priorities, and relationships with communities.
Radicalizing the Politics of the Archive
| Susan Pell | Archivaria | 2015
Uses an activist archive ethnographically to show how archival spaces, practices, and relationships can challenge dominant authority while creating alternative political identities and collective memories.
Memory, Identity and the Archival Paradigm
| Archival Science | Archival Science | 2013
Connects archives with collective memory and identity formation, questioning simple metaphors of storage and emphasizing active social processes of remembering, representation, and belonging.
Introducing Critical Race Theory to Archival Discourse
| Anthony W. Dunbar | Archival Science | 2006
Applies critical race theory to archival thought, demonstrating how professional terminology, standards, and assumptions can conceal racial bias and reproduce unequal historical representation.
Of Things Said and Unsaid: Power, Archival Silences, and Power in Silence
| Rodney G. S. Carter | Archivaria | 2006
Analyzes how powerful actors create archival silences while marginalized groups may also withhold records strategically, making absence itself a contested form of political agency.
Embracing the Power of Archives
| Randall C. Jimerson | Society of American Archivists | 2005-08-18
Argues that archivists must acknowledge their influence over memory and accountability, then exercise that power ethically in service of transparency, diversity, and democratic justice.
Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives
| Terry Cook | Archivaria | 2004
Explores how postmodern theory unsettles claims of archival neutrality, encouraging practitioners to recognize records, description, appraisal, and institutional authority as historically contingent constructions.
Archives, Records, and Power: The Making of Modern Memory
| Joan M. Schwartz and Terry Cook | Archival Science | 2002
Establishes archives as active sites of power where record creation, preservation, classification, and use shape social memory, identity, citizenship, and the boundaries of historical knowledge.
The Making of Memory: The Politics of Archives, Libraries and Museums
| Richard Harvey Brown and Beth Davis-Brown | History of the Human Sciences | 1998
Examines how memory institutions construct national consciousness through professional decisions that appear technical but determine which narratives, identities, and political values receive institutional legitimacy.
Colonialism and Decolonizing Archives
Counter-Surveying Apartheid-Era Forced Removals in South Africa
| Archival Science | Archival Science | 2025
Shows how counter-surveying can expose the recordkeeping infrastructures of forced removal and support reparative memory work that contests apartheid’s spatial and documentary legacies.
Mapping Colonial Archives as Counter Practice
| ACME Editorial Collective | ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies | 2025
Explores mapping as a counter-archival practice capable of revealing colonial structures, reconnecting dispersed evidence, and enabling communities to reinterpret spaces documented through imperial administration.
Decolonising Archives in the Arctic
| International Arctic Science Committee | IASC | 2024-05-03
Describes a collaborative project addressing colonial archival practices in Arctic research and promoting Indigenous participation, ethical stewardship, reciprocal access, and community authority over knowledge.
Decolonial Futures for African Collections
| J. A. McGregor | Third Text | 2024
Surveys decolonizing initiatives involving African collections, focusing on provenance, authority, partnership, institutional change, and the unequal conditions governing knowledge held by European museums.
On Anti-Colonial Time: Encountering Archival Traces
| The South Atlantic Quarterly | The South Atlantic Quarterly | 2024
Considers archival traces through anti-colonial concepts of time, challenging linear histories and showing how violence, survival, haunting, and unfinished political struggles coexist in records.
Successful Approaches to Decolonizing Archives
| American Library Association | ALA News | 2023-08-09
Highlights practical strategies for revising description, building equitable partnerships, acknowledging harmful provenance, and shifting authority toward communities historically represented through colonial institutions.
Lost Unities: An Exhibition for Archival Repatriation
| Forget Chaterera-Zambuko and James Lowry | Museum of British Colonialism | 2023-03-29
Uses exhibition-making to argue for archival repatriation, reconnecting displaced records with communities and questioning ownership arrangements inherited from British colonial administration.
Engagement with Decolonizing Archival Practices in the United Kingdom
| F. Janssen | Archives and Records | 2023
Assesses how United Kingdom repositories understand and implement decolonizing work, identifying progress alongside institutional uncertainty, uneven resources, and limited transfers of decision-making power.
Unsilencing Colonial Archives via Automated Entity Recognition
Tests computational methods for recovering people obscured in colonial records while warning that automated extraction must remain attentive to historical bias, terminology, and archival context.
The Archival Colour Line: Race, Records and Post-Colonial Custody
| R. Linebaugh | Archives and Records | 2021
Examines how racial hierarchies continue through the location, ownership, custody, and accessibility of records, linking post-colonial archival arrangements to enduring global inequality.
Digital Repatriation as a Decolonizing Practice in the Archaeological Archive
| Krystiana L. Krupa and Kelsey T. Grimm | Advances in Archaeological Practice | 2021
Considers digital return as one component of decolonizing archaeological archives, emphasizing community consultation, culturally appropriate access, shared stewardship, and limits of purely virtual restitution.
Decolonising the Archive: Responsibilities for Researchers and Archive Professionals
| Archivoz Editorial Team | Archivoz International Archives Magazine | 2020-04-07
Outlines responsibilities for confronting colonial collecting, language, arrangement, and access, urging researchers and professionals to make power relations visible throughout archival work.
To Go Beyond: Towards a Decolonial Archival Praxis
| J. J. Ghaddar and Michelle Caswell | Archival Science | 2019-05-28
Develops a decolonial archival praxis that moves beyond inclusion within existing systems toward transforming relationships, epistemologies, institutions, and material structures inherited from colonialism.
Decolonising Archives
| L’Internationale Online | L’Internationale Online | 2016
Brings together perspectives on colonial archives, artistic intervention, restitution, digitization, and institutional critique to reconsider how archival authority can be dismantled and redistributed.
Colonial Archives and the Arts of Governance
| Ann Laura Stoler | Archival Science | 2002
Treats colonial archives as technologies of governance rather than passive repositories, reading their classifications, anxieties, routines, and omissions as evidence of imperial rule in practice.
Community Archives and Archival Activism
Strategies of Social Movement Archivists for Coalition Building
| Archival Science | Archival Science | 2026
Shows how movement archives preserve practical knowledge about coalition building, negotiation, solidarity, conflict, and intergenerational learning while actively supporting contemporary organizing.
TEACH and CARE: Community-Centered Archival Praxis
| Thuy Vo Dang | Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies | 2026
Offers a community-centered model that combines education, accountability, relationships, and ethical care to redistribute archival authority and support collaborative stewardship.
Until Dignity Becomes Customary: Archiving the #28A Strike in Colombia
Documents the creation of a social archive after Colombia’s 2021 protests, presenting archiving as a future-oriented practice for justice, dignity, testimony, and movement continuity.
It Is the Politics of Visibility: The Community Archives Saving History
| Hyphen Editorial Team | Hyphen | 2024-08-16
Examines community collections as interventions in visibility, showing how self-documentation counters exclusion from mainstream repositories and enables communities to define their own historical significance.
The Radical Archives Movement Making Art from Forgotten Histories
| The Guardian | The Guardian | 2024-07-08
Profiles artists and grassroots archivists who recover overlooked materials, using creative practice to challenge institutional histories and reconnect suppressed memories with contemporary publics.
Loss and the Production of Community Archives
| Cultural Politics | Cultural Politics | 2024-07-01
Explores how experiences of loss motivate community archiving while shaping collection practices, affective relationships, political claims, and struggles over whose histories survive.
Situating Community Archives Along the Continuum of Community-Engaged Archival Praxis
| Lindsay Kistler Mattock | Archival Issues | 2023
Places community archives within a broader continuum of engagement, clarifying differences in ownership, participation, institutional control, collaboration, and community authority.
Issues in Community Archives Research
| E. Volk | InterActions | 2023
Reviews recurring questions in community archives research, including sustainability, professionalization, autonomy, access, representation, funding, and relationships with mainstream cultural institutions.
I Can’t Wait for You to Die: A Community Archives Critique
| Harrison Apple | Archivaria | 2021-11-26
Critiques extractive institutional acquisition and argues that professional archives should sometimes support community control, strategic forgetting, and relationships that do not culminate in custody.
Archival Readiness
| Archivaria | Archivaria | 2021
Examines barriers facing people experiencing homelessness in archival systems and proposes more collaborative recordkeeping practices attentive to exclusion, instability, and community-defined evidence.
The Information Work of Community Archives: A Systematic Literature Review
| Alex H. Poole | Journal of Documentation | 2020
Reviews scholarship describing community archives as sites of identity, empowerment, activism, social justice, information work, and resistance to documentary marginalization.
What We Do Crosses Over to Activism: The Politics and Practice of Community Archives
Draws on interviews with community archivists to show how their daily work combines preservation with activism, identity building, political education, and direct community service.
A Process Where We’re All at the Table: Community Archives in Southern California
| Jimmy Zavala and colleagues | Archives and Manuscripts | 2017
Analyzes community-led strategies in Southern California, emphasizing shared authority, relationship building, cultural competence, and the importance of communities controlling archival decisions.
To Be Able to Imagine Otherwise: Community Archives and Representation
| Michelle Caswell | Archives and Records | 2017
Argues that community archives counter symbolic annihilation by enabling marginalized people to see themselves in history and imagine more just social futures.
Whose Memories, Whose Archives? Independent Community Archives, Autonomy and the Mainstream
| Andrew Flinn, Mary Stevens, and Elizabeth Shepherd | Archival Science | 2009
Examines the political importance of independent community archives and the risks that partnership with mainstream repositories may pose to autonomy, ownership, and activist purpose.
Indigenous Archival Sovereignty
Global Information Resurgence: Transforming Indigenous Archival Sovereignty
| Jennifer R. O’Neal | UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations | 2026
Traces Indigenous activism across archives, libraries, and museums, framing archival sovereignty as relational resurgence grounded in self-determination, survivance, international solidarity, and community authority.
Centering Sovereignty in Archives
| Margot Note | Lucidea | 2025-09-15
Explains decolonial approaches that center Indigenous control over description, access, digitization, cultural protocols, intellectual property, stewardship, and decisions about return.
Protocols at 20
| Society of American Archivists | Society of American Archivists | 2025
Reviews two decades of the Protocols for Native American Archival Materials and highlights continuing work on sovereignty, repatriation, respectful access, and Indigenous cultural authority.
Designed with Care: Mukurtu Provides Ethical Tools for Archiving and Preservation
| Mellon Foundation | Mellon Foundation | 2024-12-10
Profiles Mukurtu’s community-designed tools for culturally specific access, traditional knowledge labels, local governance, and ethical digital stewardship of Indigenous heritage.
Supporting Cultural Rights and Indigenous Sovereignty through Archival Repatriation
| Amanda H. Sorensen, Ia Bull, Diana Marsh, and Samantha Lee | Polar Journal | 2024-09-21
Discusses archival repatriation as a cultural-rights practice that restores relationships, supports Indigenous governance, and challenges institutions to relinquish unilateral control over ancestral materials.
Returning Love to Ancestors Captured in the Archives
| Kirsten Thorpe and colleagues | Archival Science | 2024-05-22
Connects archival sovereignty with Indigenous wellbeing, arguing that respectful return, care, kinship, and community authority can repair harms caused by extractive collecting.
Designing Indigenous-Led Archival Futures
| Kirsten Thorpe | Archives and Manuscripts | 2024
Applies Indigenous research methodologies to archival practice, prioritizing relational accountability, community leadership, cultural safety, self-determination, and futures designed beyond colonial institutions.
In Consideration of Indigenous Data Sovereignty
| Jennafer Shae Roberts and Laura N. Montoya | arXiv | 2023-09-19
Critiques data mining as a colonial practice and applies the CARE Principles to technology, environmental knowledge, governance, and Indigenous rights over data.
Tribal Archives Is Self-Determination
| The American Archivist Reviews Portal | The American Archivist Reviews Portal | 2023-08-03
Explains how tribal archives strengthen governance, cultural continuity, language, land claims, and community memory by keeping decision-making authority within Indigenous nations.
Developing the Mukurtu Hubs and Spokes Model in Australia
| Kirsten Thorpe and colleagues | Australasian Journal of Information Systems | 2021
Describes a networked model for supporting Indigenous digital archives through local control, shared infrastructure, training, culturally appropriate access, and long-term community capacity.
The Passamaquoddy Reclaim Their Culture Through Digital Repatriation
| Anna Altman | The New Yorker | 2019-01-30
Shows how returning digitized recordings enabled Passamaquoddy people to restore language and cultural knowledge while raising questions about ownership, access, and institutional responsibility.
The Songline Is Alive in Mukurtu
| Kimberly Christen | Archival Returns | 2019
Examines how Indigenous communities reuse returned digital materials within living cultural systems, emphasizing respect, local protocols, reciprocal relationships, and knowledge continuity.
Sovereignty, Repatriation, and the Archival Imagination
| Kimberly Christen | Collections | 2015-06
Analyzes Indigenous curation and display practices as sovereign acts that reconfigure archival ownership, institutional authority, digital return, and relationships between collections and communities.
Tribal Archives, Traditional Knowledge, and Local Contexts
| Kimberly Christen | Journal of Western Archives | 2015
Explains tools that communicate culturally specific rules for access and reuse, challenging universal open-access assumptions and supporting Indigenous governance of traditional knowledge.
Protocols for Native American Archival Materials
| First Archivists Circle | First Archivists Circle | 2006
Provides foundational guidance for culturally responsive care, consultation, access, description, copying, repatriation, and stewardship of Native American archival materials.
Black Archives and Racial Justice
Trump Wants to Erase Black History. Digital Archivists Are Racing to Save It
Reports on digital preservation efforts responding to government removals of Black historical material, showing how political change can rapidly endanger public records and educational resources.
Doing Public Historical Geography in a Black Archive
| J. F. Nicholson | Journal of Historical Geography | 2025
Reflects on research within a Black archive as collaborative public scholarship, emphasizing place, community knowledge, institutional power, and responsibility to historically marginalized record creators.
The Black Archives and the Archive of Black Marxism
| Small Axe | Small Axe | 2024-11-01
Considers Black archives as intellectual and political formations, linking preservation to radical theory, anticolonial struggle, labor, diaspora, and traditions of Black Marxist thought.
Archiving the Black Web: Research and Access in Context
| Archiving the Black Web | International Internet Preservation Consortium | 2024-04
Explores the technical, ethical, and political challenges of preserving Black online culture, including contextual integrity, platform disappearance, researcher access, and community-centered stewardship.
Re-membering Blackness: Digital Archives, Collective Memory, and a University’s Racial Past
| C. Farry | portal: Libraries and the Academy | 2024
Examines a university project recovering Black history and shows how digital archives can support institutional reckoning, collective memory, community learning, and antiracist change.
Navigating Archival Silences: Black History at Purdue
| S. L. Morris | Purdue University Libraries | 2024
Uses missing and fragmented records to examine institutional Black history, demonstrating how researchers can acknowledge archival silence while recovering overlooked people, events, and resistance.
How Black Memory Workers Leverage Their Racial and Cultural Identities
| Bergis Jules | University of California | 2024
Develops an insider-affirming approach to collection development, showing how Black memory workers draw on lived experience and cultural knowledge when building archives.
Preserving Black Women’s Stories as a Labor of Love
| SAPIENS | SAPIENS | 2021-10-21
Profiles Black feminist archival work as care, activism, and intellectual preservation, emphasizing the vulnerability of personal collections and the importance of community trust.
Antiracism and Black Memory in the Archives
| A. Rodrigues | Archives and Records | 2021
Describes an antiracist archival project that expands Black memory, revises institutional practice, and confronts discriminatory structures in collection building, description, and public engagement.
Preliminary Observations by a Black Scholar-Practitioner
| The American Archivist | The American Archivist | 2020-12-14
Reflects on racism within archival education and professional practice, connecting personal experience with structural critique and calls for sustained institutional accountability.
16 Black Feminist Archival Projects You Need to Know About
| Black Women Radicals | Black Women Radicals | 2020-06-24
Surveys grassroots projects preserving Black feminist thought, organizing, art, and everyday life while challenging institutional neglect and expanding access to movement history.
The Fight to Preserve African-American History
| The New Yorker | The New Yorker | 2020-01-27
Examines preservation efforts centered on African American sites and collections, revealing tensions over funding, ownership, national memory, and the public recognition of racial violence.
The Black Archives: Exploring the Politics of Black Dutch Radicals
| Mitchell Esajas and colleagues | Open Cultural Studies | 2019
Examines a community archive documenting Black Dutch radicalism and shows how collecting, exhibitions, and public programs contest national narratives of race and colonialism.
Black Archives in the United Kingdom
| Race, Culture and Equality Working Group | Royal Geographical Society | 2019
Maps Black archival collections and access challenges in the United Kingdom, identifying institutional gaps and opportunities for research, collaboration, and community visibility.
This Black Woman’s Work: Exploring Archival Projects that Center Black Women
| C. Powell | KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies | 2018
Centers Black women as active memory workers whose archival projects combine care, justice, self-representation, community accountability, and resistance to documentary erasure.
Feminist, Queer, and Trans Archives
The Women’s Library at 100
| The Guardian Editorial Board | The Guardian | 2026-04-03
Celebrates a century of feminist collecting while arguing that preserving women’s history requires continuing resources, public access, institutional commitment, and attention to ongoing inequality.
Power, Politics, and Protest in the Queer Feminist Archive/s
| T. M. Doherty | University of Arizona | 2026
Examines queer feminist archives as sites of protest across the Americas, connecting preservation with embodied activism, political struggle, transnational exchange, and alternative knowledge production.
LGBTQ+ Archives Defy Erasure One Memory at a Time
Profiles LGBTQ+ archivists preserving vulnerable histories amid political hostility, emphasizing decentralized collecting, digital access, intergenerational memory, and resistance to organized erasure.
Bayard Rustin’s Papers Become a Digital Archive
| Associated Press | AP News | 2025-07-08
Reports on digitizing Bayard Rustin’s papers, expanding access to the record of a Black gay strategist whose central role was long marginalized in public memory.
Doing LGBTQ Internet Histories Justice
| J. Verhoef | Internet Histories | 2025
Proposes a queer web-archive methodology attentive to unstable platforms, missing content, context collapse, ethical risk, and the limits of conventional digital historical methods.
Get Lost in This Archive of Queer, Trans, and Lesbian Print Media from the South
Highlights Southern queer print collections that document politics, culture, organizing, and everyday life, demonstrating the historical depth and regional diversity of LGBTQ+ communities.
The Influence of Feminist Archival Theory on State Archival Exhibitions
| Archives and Manuscripts | Archives and Manuscripts | 2024
Investigates how feminist theory can reshape state archival exhibitions through attention to voice, relationality, absence, intersectionality, emotional knowledge, and institutional authority.
Working with Queer Archives through Radical Empathy
| K. Fife | Manchester Metropolitan University | 2024
Applies radical empathy to queer archival research, emphasizing affect, vulnerability, ethical relationships, researcher positionality, and care for people represented in sensitive collections.
Archives as Queer Infrastructure
| Zarin Tasnim | Society and Space | 2022-12-12
Frames queer archives as infrastructure that sustains relationships, survival, imagination, and collective life rather than merely storing evidence of identities or past events.
I Hate the Archives: A Queer Lesbian Meditation
| H. Sikk | Journal of Feminist Scholarship | 2021
Uses queer discomfort and affect to question archival authority, research conventions, desire, absence, and the emotional contradictions of seeking marginalized lives in institutional collections.
Archival Activism, Symbolic Annihilation, and the LGBTQ2+ Community Archive
| Elspeth H. Brown | Archivaria | 2020
Shows how LGBTQ2+ community archives resist symbolic annihilation by creating visible, usable historical records that support identity, activism, education, and intergenerational belonging.
Critical Feminism in the Archives
| Michelle Caswell and Marika Cifor | Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies | 2017
Connects feminist movements with archival self-representation and critiques approaches that reduce archival politics to representation without transforming labor, institutions, and power relations.
Archives and New Modes of Feminist Research
| Australian Feminist Studies | Australian Feminist Studies | 2017
Explores how feminist researchers use archives experimentally, reading fragments, bodies, affect, and silence to develop methods beyond conventional documentary evidence.
A Queer/ed Archival Methodology: Archival Bodies as Nomadic Subjects
| Jamie Ann Lee | Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies | 2017
Develops an embodied queer archival methodology through oral history, treating bodies and records as changing, multiple, relational, and resistant to fixed classification.
Accessing Transgender: Desiring Queer(er?) Archival Logics
| K. J. Rawson | Archivaria | 2010
Critiques archival systems that stabilize gender categories and proposes queer logics for describing, locating, and interpreting transgender histories without reproducing institutional erasure.
Human Rights, State Violence, and Transitional Justice
Archives for Accountability: Rule of Law, Truth, and Transitional Justice
| International Council on Archives | International Council on Archives | 2026
Brings together cases showing how records support truth-seeking, legal accountability, reparations, and institutional reform after conflict, dictatorship, and systematic human-rights violations.
The Ethics of Archives: Historical Social Science and Research on Violence
| Aliza Luft | Social Science History | 2025
Argues that researchers using records of violence must consider consent, exposure, harm, source vulnerability, and the ethical consequences of transforming traumatic documents into scholarship.
The Human Rights Archival Gap
| O. Grinberg | The International Journal of Human Rights | 2025
Identifies gaps between human-rights documentation and long-term archival preservation, emphasizing risks to evidence, survivor access, accountability, and institutional memory.
Brazilian Truth Commissions and the Contributions of Archives
| International Council on Archives | International Council on Archives | 2025
Explains how archival evidence supported Brazilian truth commissions investigating dictatorship-era violations while revealing limits created by secrecy, missing records, and institutional resistance.
No AI After Auschwitz? Bridging AI and Memory Ethics
| Mykola Makhortykh | arXiv | 2024-01-23
Examines ethical risks in applying artificial intelligence to Holocaust memory, including distortion, automation, bias, authenticity, and responsibility toward victims and descendants.
Transformative Justice and the Archives of Childhood
| Archives and Records | Archives and Records | 2021
Describes interdisciplinary archival work concerning children’s rights, showing how participatory methods can support recognition, repair, agency, and transformative justice.
Archives and Transitional Justice in Chile
| Human Rights Review | Human Rights Review | 2021
Analyzes the crucial relationship between Chilean archives and transitional justice, including evidence gathering, memory, victim recognition, legal accountability, and continuing struggles over access.
Transitional Archives: Towards a Conceptualisation of Archives in Transitional Justice
| Julia Viebach | The International Journal of Human Rights | 2020
Challenges assumptions that archives naturally advance justice, examining how transitional institutions create, use, control, and sometimes depoliticize records of mass violence.
Whither the Human in Human Rights?
| Mario H. Ramirez | Archivaria | 2020
Questions how human-rights archives recognize personhood and agency, arguing that archival systems can reproduce misrecognition even while claiming to document suffering and defend rights.
Atrocity’s Archives: The Role of Archives in Transitional Justice
| Oxford Transitional Justice Research and swisspeace | University of Oxford | 2018
Provides guidance on preserving atrocity records for prosecutions, truth commissions, reparations, memorialization, institutional reform, and survivor access while managing security and ethical risks.
The Last Nazi Hunters
| The Guardian | The Guardian | 2017-08-31
Shows how decades-old documents, dispersed files, and patient archival research remain essential to identifying perpetrators and pursuing accountability long after mass crimes occurred.
Basic Principles on the Role of Archivists in Support of Human Rights
| International Council on Archives | International Council on Archives | 2016
Sets ethical principles for protecting records, resisting destruction, supporting access, documenting abuses, safeguarding whistleblowers, and serving victims of human-rights violations.
Defining Human Rights Archives
| Michelle Caswell | Archival Science | 2014-09-03
Defines human-rights archives through communities formed around records of abuse, emphasizing affected people’s claims to ownership, access, interpretation, and stewardship.
Brazil Truth Commission Releases Its Final Report
| National Security Archive | George Washington University | 2014
Summarizes findings of Brazil’s truth commission and provides declassified records that illuminate dictatorship-era repression, foreign involvement, disappearances, and continuing demands for accountability.
Archives as Agents of Accountability and Justice
| University of Pittsburgh | University of Pittsburgh | 2012
Examines how the National Security Archive uses records to advance investigations, legal claims, public truth, and accountability for past human-rights abuses.
State Archives, Secrecy, and Public Access
The Presidential Records Act and the Department of Justice Challenge
| First Amendment Encyclopedia | Middle Tennessee State University | 2026-04-10
Explains the legal and historical stakes of a Justice Department challenge that could weaken post-Watergate rules treating presidential records as public property.
Constitutionality of the Presidential Records Act
| U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel | U.S. Department of Justice | 2026-04-01
Presents a constitutional challenge to parts of the Presidential Records Act, raising major questions about executive control, public ownership, preservation, and access to presidential records.
Trump’s Hostile Takeover of the National Archives and Our Nation’s History
| American Oversight | American Oversight | 2025-03-12
Documents political pressure on the National Archives and argues that leadership changes and interference threaten independent recordkeeping, public accountability, and trustworthy national history.
Revealed: The Guide the Ministry of Defence Uses to Keep Its Secrets
| The Guardian | The Guardian | 2025-03-08
Reveals internal criteria used to withhold British defense records, illustrating how classification, exemptions, royal sensitivities, and bureaucratic discretion restrict historical access.
Trump Fires the Head of the National Archives
| Politico | Politico | 2025-02-07
Reports the dismissal of the United States archivist, placing the event within broader disputes over presidential records, institutional independence, and control of federal history.
The Future of History: Trump Could Leave Less Documentation Than Previous Presidents
| Associated Press | AP News | 2025
Reports on disappearing websites, encrypted communications, weakened oversight, and poor recordkeeping practices that may leave substantial gaps in the documentary history of an administration.
Archives Must Be Allowed to Operate Without Political Interference
| Society of American Archivists | Society of American Archivists | 2024-12-02
Defends professional independence and warns that political manipulation of archival exhibitions, descriptions, access, or leadership undermines public trust and democratic accountability.
The National Archives Deletes Our Problematic Past
| The Common Reader | Washington University in St. Louis | 2024-11-12
Criticizes efforts to soften difficult history in public displays, arguing that avoiding controversy distorts the record and weakens archives’ educational and democratic responsibilities.
The National Archives Museum Is Under Fire for Scrubbing Difficult History
| Brian Boucher | Artnet News | 2024-11-06
Reports allegations that museum planners removed contentious material, demonstrating how exhibition design can become a political struggle over national identity and historical discomfort.
Access to Public Archives in Europe
| M. Friedewald and colleagues | Archives and Records | 2024
Compares European access policies and implementation, revealing uneven legal standards, restrictions, administrative practices, digitization levels, and practical barriers confronting archival researchers.
The Presidential Records Act
| National Archives and Records Administration | National Archives and Records Administration | 2022
Explains the law establishing public ownership and preservation of presidential records, including transfer, access restrictions, disposal procedures, and responsibilities of outgoing administrations.
Guidance on Presidential Records
| David S. Ferriero | National Archives and Records Administration | 2021
Sets out recordkeeping expectations for electronic messages, social media, classified information, personal accounts, and the transfer of presidential materials to the National Archives.
Archiving as Politics in the National Security State
| Kirsten Weld | Knight First Amendment Institute | 2018-09-13
Shows how secrecy, declassification, destruction, and archival access shape national-security history, using Latin American state violence and United States records as central examples.
Confiscated Histories: Access to Sensitive Government Records in France
Argues that French access reforms coexist with renewed restrictions, allowing secrecy and privilege to continue governing sensitive state archives despite formal commitments to transparency.
Accountability, Open Government and Record Keeping: Time to Think Again?
| Records Management Journal | Records Management Journal | 2011
Revisits assumptions connecting records, openness, and accountability, arguing that transparency initiatives fail when governments neglect the systems needed to create and preserve reliable evidence.
Digital Archives, Web Memory, and Algorithms
Archives, Archival Bond, and Digital Representation
| Martin Critelli | arXiv | 2026-01-21
Reconsiders relationships among records in digital environments, asking how representation, metadata, systems, and computational processing affect context, authenticity, and archival meaning.
The Algorithm of Silence
| Journal of Documentation | Journal of Documentation | 2026-01-20
Examines how artificial intelligence can reproduce archival bias and historical exclusion, arguing for ethical reconstruction methods that make automated silences visible and contestable.
Digital Archivists Resist an Unprecedented Purge of Government Websites
| Le Monde | Le Monde | 2025-02-19
Reports emergency efforts to capture deleted federal webpages and datasets, illustrating how web archiving becomes political infrastructure when official information is rapidly removed.
How Can We Improve the Diversity of Archival Collections with AI?
| Lise Jaillant and colleagues | AI & Society | 2025
Explores whether artificial intelligence can reveal underrepresented people and themes while emphasizing biased training data, professional judgment, transparency, and collaboration with affected communities.
Alternative Archives: Researching Politics with Chunks of the Internet
| Political Studies | Political Studies | 2024-11-16
Examines fragmented digital materials as alternative political archives, addressing instability, context, platform dependence, researcher judgment, and methodological opportunities beyond official collections.
Source Criticism, Bias, and Representativeness in the Digital Age
| Daniel Burchardt | Digital Scholarship in the Humanities | 2024-06-13
Updates source criticism for digitized collections, showing how selection, scanning, metadata, search interfaces, and platform design influence which historical patterns researchers perceive.
The Power of Absence: Thinking with Archival Theory in Algorithmic Design
| Jihan Sherman, Romi Morrison, Lauren Klein, and Daniela K. Rosner | arXiv | 2024-05-08
Uses archival theory to reinterpret algorithmic bias, treating absence as historically produced power rather than a simple data defect to be filled computationally.
Data Is Never Raw: Ethics and Biases in Digital Cultural Heritage Collections
| Science Museum Group | Science Museum Group Journal Blog | 2023-06-20
Explains how museum data inherits biases from collecting, cataloguing, terminology, digitization, and institutional history, challenging assumptions that datasets are neutral technical resources.
Digital History and the Politics of Digitization
| Gerben Zaagsma | Digital Scholarship in the Humanities | 2023
Proposes a framework for analyzing digitization politically through selection, funding, infrastructure, labor, access, ownership, and the uneven global distribution of digital heritage.
Applying AI to Digital Archives
| Lise Jaillant and colleagues | Digital Scholarship in the Humanities | 2023
Identifies trust, collaboration, explainability, professional ethics, and shared expertise as central requirements when artificial intelligence is used to unlock archival collections.
Representing Biases, Inequalities and Silences in National Web Archives
| K. Hegarty | Archives and Manuscripts | 2022
Examines how national web archives can document their own gaps and biases, making collection boundaries and unequal online representation more visible to researchers.
Taming Abundance: Doing Digital Archival Research as Political Scientists
| D. S. Kim and colleagues | PS: Political Science & Politics | 2022
Offers practical methods for navigating large digital archives while stressing source criticism, reproducibility, search limitations, missing context, and the political construction of datasets.
Unlocking Digital Archives: AI and Sensitivity Review
| Lise Jaillant and colleagues | AI & Society | 2022
Explores cross-disciplinary uses of artificial intelligence for reviewing sensitive records, balancing expanded access with privacy, legal restrictions, institutional risk, and ethical accountability.
Where Did the Web Archive Go?
| Mohamed Aturban, Michael L. Nelson, and Michele C. Weigle | arXiv | 2021-08-12
Investigates disappearing web-archive links and redirects, showing how technical changes can undermine citations, reproducibility, and long-term access to preserved online evidence.
Ethical Challenges and Current Practices in Activist Social Media Archives
| Amanda Velte | The American Archivist | 2018
Examines consent, surveillance, ownership, exposure, and future harm when archivists preserve activists’ social-media content created in volatile political contexts.
National Memory, Museums, and Restitution
France Passes Law on Restitution of Cultural Artifacts Looted during Colonial Rule
| Le Monde | Le Monde | 2026-05-08
Reports legislation creating a broader process for returning colonial-era cultural objects, reflecting a political shift from exceptional restitutions toward more systematic historical repair.
The Delicate Heritage of Human Remains
| Le Monde | Le Monde | 2026-04-08
Examines ethical and political debates over displaying, researching, storing, and returning human remains acquired through colonialism, archaeology, medicine, and racial science.
Nigeria Is Burying Its History in the Arctic World Archive
| The Guardian | The Guardian | 2026-03-17
Describes Nigeria’s effort to preserve cultural and governmental memory in Svalbard, raising questions about technological durability, national heritage, access, and archival security.
Zurich Museum Transfers Ownership of Looted Benin Bronzes to Nigeria
| Town & Country | Town & Country | 2026
Reports the transfer of ownership of Benin Bronzes, illustrating how provenance research and restitution claims are reshaping relationships between European museums and African nations.
Restitution of Colonial Heritage Collections in Belgium and the United Kingdom
| Review of International Studies | Review of International Studies | 2025
Compares how two states partially implement emerging restitution norms, revealing the influence of law, institutional interests, political framing, and unequal international power.
Reframing Return and Restitution of Cultural Property in Southern Africa
Presents restitution as a process of healing and renewed relationships, emphasizing regional cooperation, community voice, provenance, cultural rights, and institutional responsibility.
Colonial Collections, Restitution and Issues of Inequality
| Jos van Beurden | International Social Science Journal | 2024
Examines who controls provenance research, negotiations, and returns, arguing that restitution processes can reproduce inequality unless source communities gain meaningful decision-making power.
Looted Cultural Objects
| Columbia Law Review | Columbia Law Review | 2024
Analyzes legal approaches to cultural objects taken through war, colonialism, theft, and coercive exchange, questioning ownership rules that privilege current possessors.
Hard and Soft Law Measures for Restitution: The Netherlands
| Jos van Beurden | Santander Art and Culture Law Review | 2023
Reviews Dutch legal and policy mechanisms for returning colonial collections, assessing their effectiveness, limitations, institutional discretion, and relationship to international norms.
National Archives, National Memory?
| R. Rydén | Archival Science | 2023
Compares how national archives describe their missions, revealing differing assumptions about state service, public memory, citizenship, identity, access, and institutional legitimacy.
LOOT: Colonial Collections and African Restitution Debates
| Origins Editorial Team | Origins: Current Events in Historical Perspective | 2022
Provides historical context for African restitution claims, tracing military looting, colonial collecting, museum acquisition, independence-era demands, and contemporary political negotiations.
Ethical Principles for Colonial Collections in Belgium
| Restitution Belgium | Restitution Belgium | 2021
Proposes principles for provenance, dialogue, accessibility, ownership, and return, urging Belgian institutions to recognize colonial violence and the rights of communities of origin.
European Museums and the Repatriation of African Artifacts
Examines why repeated museum promises have produced limited returns, highlighting legal barriers, institutional resistance, political symbolism, and demands from African scholars and governments.
Politics of Memories: Identity Construction in Museums
| C. X. Zhang and colleagues | Annals of Tourism Research | 2018
Analyzes how museums construct identity through selected narratives and displays, showing that visitor memory and national representation emerge from politically structured interpretation.
The Politics of Memory: South Africa’s Archival Landscape
| University of Cape Town | Archival Platform | 2013-12-18
Examines post-apartheid archival institutions, access, resources, public memory, and transformation, asking whether the national archival system adequately supports democratic accountability and social justice.
